search for: llopard

Hi Ivan, I'm just looking into it now. Thanks for working on this. - Lang. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again, > > Just forgot to add PATCH prefix to my message! Could you please review it ? > > Ivan > > Le 26/05/2012 00:52, Ivan Llopard a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I have a custom scheduler/bundler running just after c...

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > > On 07/05/2012 18:15, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com> >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Tuning my TargetAs...

Hi Eli, On 07/05/2012 18:15, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Tuning my TargetAsmPrinter implementation in the back-end side, I >> discovered that the address space number is not passed down while >> emitting global variables with constant initializers. The information is &...

Hi all, Tuning my TargetAsmPrinter implementation in the back-end side, I discovered that the address space number is not passed down while emitting global variables with constant initializers. The information is dropped at AsmPrinter::EmitGlobalConstant() function call which defaults it to zero. I would like to emit target-dependent asm directives depending on the address space of constant

...atch looks good. Committed in r157632. Thanks Ivan! - Lang. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > I'm just looking into it now. Thanks for working on this. > > - Lang. > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> Just forgot to add PATCH prefix to my message! Could you please review it >> ? >> >> Ivan >> >> Le 26/05/2012 00:52, Ivan Llopard a écrit : >> > Hi, >> > >> > I...

Le 07/05/2012 17:15, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit : > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> Thanks for your quick response Joerg. >> >> We have a very small test case where there is global array and its >> address space attribute specified like in the following code >> >> const int __attribute__((address_space(256))) fangle[13] = >> {...

Hi Eli, Thanks for your response. Please see my responses below. On 10/12/2011 00:28, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Llopard Ivan<ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am writing a back-end for a processor that has complex type registers. >> It has two functional units to perform complex multiplications. >> From clang, I emulate a complex multiplication using vectors a...

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:57:15AM +0200, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Le 07/05/2012 17:15, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit : > >On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Ivan Llopard wrote: > >>Thanks for your quick response Joerg. > >> > >>We have a very small test case where there is global array and its > >>address...

...dynamic loaded pass. It's worth to note that if I change this pass to be a ModulePass instead, the required pass LoopSimplify is scheduled on-the-fly without problems. Is there any reason to not specialize addLowerLevelRequiredPass() for function managers ? Ivan Le 23/03/2012 17:00, Ivan Llopard a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm writing a function pass which is dynamically loaded by opt and I > need some analysis and passes to be run before my pass: > > virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > AU.a...

...e for greater ones. >>> I agree; let's keep it around for now. >>> >>> -Anshu >>> >>> --- >>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of the Code Aurora Forum >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/18/2012 3:47 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >>>> Hi Anshu, >>>> >>>> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and >>>> I fixed the violation of column numbers. >>>> >>>> On 15/06/2012 21:31, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: >>>>> Hi...

Hi again, Just forgot to add PATCH prefix to my message! Could you please review it ? Ivan Le 26/05/2012 00:52, Ivan Llopard a écrit : > Hi, > > I have a custom scheduler/bundler running just after coalescing as > proposed by the current infrastructure of machine schedulers. Btw, > great thanks for this cool stuff ! > I'm running into problems when I want to update the LI information of > an i...

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:50:12 +0100 Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Finkel, > > Le 23/03/2012 05:50, Hal Finkel a écrit : > > The PowerPC backend on PPC64 for non-Darwin (SVR4 ABI) systems > > currently has a problem handling integer types smaller than 64 bits. > > This is because the ABI spe...

Hi Hal, On 21/11/2012 22:38, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ivan Llopard" <ivanllopard at gmail.com> >> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:31:07 AM >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Disable loop unroll pass >> >> Hi, >> >> We've a target which h...

Committed in r159281. -Anshu On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi Anshu, > > I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just > checked it. Could you please commit it? > > Ivan > > On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Sorry, I should have been mo...

On 10/12/2011 01:32, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli, >> Thanks for your response. Please see my responses below. >> >> >> On 10/12/2011 00:28, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Llopard Ivan<ivanllopard at gmail.com> >>> wro...

...ation through a target-depend asm directive. At the moment, I've overridden EmitGlobalVariable() from AsmPrinter because I didn't see any other spot to put this special directive. Ivan Le 07/05/2012 14:35, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit : > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0200, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> I would like to emit target-dependent asm directives depending on the >> address space of constant initializers. Is there another method to >> implement this feature ? > I'm not sure I understand what your problem is. Can you provide an > example of what you se...

...for small DFA tables may not be a win > > and it may still be the case for greater ones. > > I agree; let's keep it around for now. > > -Anshu > > --- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of the Code Aurora Forum > > > > On 6/18/2012 3:47 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >> Hi Anshu, >> >> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and >> I fixed the violation of column numbers. >> >> On 15/06/2012 21:31, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote: >>> Hi Ivan, >>> >>> The patch looks good t...

Hi, I'm writing a function pass which is dynamically loaded by opt and I need some analysis and passes to be run before my pass: virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>(); AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID); AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);

...07, Akira Hatanaka a écrit : > If you need llvm::Argument, this returns the iterator pointing to the > first argument: > > Function::const_arg_iterator Arg = > DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->arg_begin(); Thanks Akira. Ivan > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How can I get the llvm-type of the formal argument while lowering it ? >> >> My target needs to map pointer and non-pointer parameters to different >> registers. In addition, parameter lowering is address space...

Hi, We've a target which has hardware support for zero-overhead loops. Currently, we cannot detect them because the loop unroller is unrolling them before entering into the codegen. Looking at its implementation, it seems that it checks if it is profitable to unroll it or not based on certain parameters. Given that zero cost loops building is based more or less on the same constraints