search for: lle_x_

The blog post I linked to implied that adding a symbol in the form lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME would allow you to call a function called FUNCTIONNAME. Is this not the case? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:46 PM, <o.j.sivart at gmail.com> wrote: > You are adding the symbol as "lle_X_create_number_object" yet your error > message implies you have tried to lookup a...

Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> writes: > Ok, so calling lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME instead of FUNCTIONNAME works (is there > any reason the post used the lle_X_ prefix other than convention? was it > once possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, why > did the blog post think it was possible?) AFAIK you can name the function as you...

Ok, so calling lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME instead of FUNCTIONNAME works (is there any reason the post used the lle_X_ prefix other than convention? was it once possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, why did the blog post think it was possible?) I'm now running into trouble when trying to access...

...Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel as well. > > Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> writes: > > > Ok, so calling lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME instead of FUNCTIONNAME works (is there > > any reason the post used the lle_X_ prefix other than convention? was it > > once possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, > why > > did the blog post think it was possible?) > > AFAIK you...