search for: llbm

Hello, with the latest LLVM (almost 2.0 CVS) what is the right way to read a module from a byte array fetched from a database? I thought that I could subclass llbm::module to add my own fields (typically, a MySQL id number) and then parse it as bitcode, but I am stuck, since apparently the only way to parse bitcode is to use a BitcodeReader then calling materializeModule gives a fresh llvm Module (not my subclass) As a general question, are Llvm classes sup...

...find any occurrence! Is this a bug or a misunderstanding of mine? Can I assume the bytecode interface is obsolete and to be replaced by bitcode? BTW, my hoobby project is an hypertextual programming language experiment with only a Web interface (no source files). So I want to store every procuced llbm Module in a MySQL database. Regards -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***

...n MemoryBuffer to create them from files, stdio, and memory. If your buffer is in memory, just create a memorybuffer and pass in the range of bytes already in memory. Once the appropriate MemoryBuffer is created, you load it like any other bitcode stream. > I thought that I could subclass llbm::module to add my own fields > (typically, a MySQL id number) and then parse it as bitcode, but I am stuck, > since apparently the only way to parse bitcode is to use a BitcodeReader > then calling materializeModule gives a fresh llvm Module (not my subclass) Right, don't do that :)....

...o reading it. I currently envision this library being used in the following ways: * An ld and link.exe compatible linker. * A loader. * Add support to lli for loading dynamic libraries referenced from .bc files when JITing. * Executable compression, encryption. * llvm-ar * llvm-nm * llvm-ranlib * llbm-objdump * etc... I decided to make a new library instead of adding this to MC because I felt that MC is not really designed for generic object file handling. It is and should be designed for working with machine code. And a test of the largest object file generated by clang -g while compiling LLV...

No one is working on it or even thinking about it. It is so far from being useful that it should probably just be removed. -Chris On Sep 27, 2009, at 4:29 PM, idoud <doudalis at gmail.com> wrote: > I found that llvm-db is the front end for lib/Debugger. > > I would like to ask you if there is anyone who is actively working on > this problem, > and if you any specific

...s aids the generation of checks in cost model tests. [r329390](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL329390). * Support was added for llvm.coro.noop intrinsics, used to implement `noop_coroutine` from the C++ Coroutines TS. [r328986](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL328986). * A python utility was added that uses llbm-objdump to to look for indirect calls or jumps in x86 assembly. [r329050](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL329050). * Initial support for generating DWARF v5 Accelerator Tables was committed. [r329179](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL329179). ## Clang commits * The new bugprone-parent-virtual-call clang-t...

I found that llvm-db is the front end for lib/Debugger. I would like to ask you if there is anyone who is actively working on this problem, and if you any specific directions/goals/wish list ~Ioannis On Sep 27, 6:41 pm, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:34 PM, idoud wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I would like to ask what is the

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > No progress since Charlie last looked at it. Sorry, I meant to refer to the issue Per Mildner mentioned regarding the tutorials not building due to RTTI - which I recall discussing with you & Eric, but don't know what came of it. > As Per suggested, it may be > worth adding an explicit #error, or at