search for: lla

...r los bucles o de que funcionase Vectorize? Adjunto un ejemplo #................... vec1a <- as.vector(1:3) n1a <- 3 n2a <- 3 P1a <- matrix(rnorm(30),nrow=3) P2a <- matrix(rnorm(30),nrow=3) Ka <- 10 # En forma de funcion producto <- function(n1a,n2a,Ka,vec1a,P1a,P2a){ LLa = numeric(2*Ka) for (i in 1:n1a){ for (j in 1:n2a){ LLa = LLa - vec1a%*%matrix(abs(P1a[i,]-P2a[j,]), nrow=length(vec1a), ncol=2*Ka, byrow=TRUE) } } return(sum(LLa)) } producto(n1a,n2a,Ka,vec1a,P1a,P2a) vproducto <- Vectorize(producto) vproducto(n1a,n2a,Ka,vec1a,P1a,P2a)...

...w=3) #P2a <- matrix(rnorm(30),nrow=3) Ka <- 10 n.val <- 30 # En forma de funcion producto <- function(n1a,n2a,Ka,vec1a,n.val){ # A eliminar una vez compruebes que la vectorización funciona set.seed(123) P1a <- matrix(rnorm(n.val),nrow=3) P1a <- matrix(rnorm(n.val),nrow=3) LLa = numeric(2*Ka) for (i in 1:n1a){ for (j in 1:n2a){ LLa = LLa - vec1a%*%matrix(abs(P1a[i,]-P2a[j,]), nrow=length(vec1a), ncol=2*Ka, byrow=TRUE) } } return(sum(LLa)) } producto(n1a,n2a,Ka,vec1a,n.val) vproducto <- Vectorize(producto) sum(vproducto(3,3,10,as.vector(1:...

...62 > rb <- gpd.fit(xa, threshold=th, ydat=ta, sigl=1) # nonstationary $threshold [1] 100 $nexc [1] 1036 $conv [1] 0 $nllh [1] 5966.575 $mle [1] 61.60260272 0.00473462 0.40523571 $rate [1] 0.01480423 $se [1] 5.902059762 0.001556933 0.037975847 > lla <- -1*as.numeric(ra$nllh) > llb <- -1*as.numeric(rb$nllh) > dif <- 2*(llb-lla) > lla; llb; dif [1] -5971.029 [1] -5966.575 [1] 8.907359 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, all I didn't get any response from swig for my question. see if I can get some help here Thanks ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: charlie <charlie.xia.fdu@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:55 PM Subject: SWIG with R and C++ STL To: swig-user@lists.sourceforge.net Hi all, I am new to SWIG. I encountered some problem when I try to SWIG to R some C++ modules. Here

Hi, The lib call (generated through LLVM framework) for 64 bit operation returns 64 bit value. But only the lower 32 bits are consumed. Even the users of higher part are consuming the lower 32 bit value only. Consider the case in Sparc or ARM long long lla, llb; int ia; void fun() { lla = llb << ia; } For such targets in the DAG after LegalizeTypes the higher 32 bits are ignored. Why are these higher 32 bits ignored? This is happening for all the lib calls returning integer value of non legal type. Regards Sachin -------...

> > Hi, > > > Consider the case in Sparc or ARM > > can you please provide a testcase in bitcode (or > LLVM assembler) form. > Please find the bitcode file and C file attached with. Regards Sachin > Thanks, > > Duncan. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: trysparc.bc Type: application/octet-stream Size: 476

...ygen and some howtos and still am not getting what I expect. I can do ssh john at 192.168.15.3 and login with a password OK. I want to be able to do that with keys in preparation for running rsync with keys, so I created a key on router1, the machine I want to ssh from. routem at router1:~/.ssh$ lla total 20 drwx------ 2 routem routem 4096 2009-03-08 09:55 . drwxr-xr-x 5 routem routem 4096 2009-03-08 13:41 .. -rw------- 1 routem routem 1675 2009-03-07 12:02 id_rsync_rsa -rw-r--r-- 1 routem routem 397 2009-03-07 12:02 id_rsync_rsa.pub -rw-r--r-- 1 routem routem 650 2009-03-08 09:56 known_host...

...mated. Here?s the share for that folder: [MediaShares] comment = Non-guest share for file manipulations path = "/share01" browseable = yes writeable = yes guest ok = no create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0755 wide links = yes When did ls -la, I got: [hal at brandyhall:Video]$ lla total 60 drwxr-xr-x 8 hal 4096 Mar 15 22:19 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 hal 4096 Mar 15 20:42 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 hal 4096 Mar 15 22:19 ._Animated drwxr-xr-x 40 hal 4096 Nov 28 23:52 Animated/ -rw-r--r-- 1 hal 4096 Mar 15 20:42 ._.DS_Store -rw-r--r-- 1 hal 14340 Mar 16 23:41 .DS_Store lrwxrwxrwx...

...index 00000000..284a2222 --- /dev/null +++ b/usr/klibc/arch/riscv64/_main.S @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# +# arch/riscv64/_main.S +# +# Does arch-specific initialization and invokes main with the +# appropriate arguments. +# + +#include <machine/asm.h> + +ENTRY(_main) + .option push + .option norelax + lla gp, __global_pointer$ + .option pop + + j main +END(_main)

...index 00000000..284a2222 --- /dev/null +++ b/usr/klibc/arch/riscv64/_main.S @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# +# arch/riscv64/_main.S +# +# Does arch-specific initialization and invokes main with the +# appropriate arguments. +# + +#include <machine/asm.h> + +ENTRY(_main) + .option push + .option norelax + lla gp, __global_pointer$ + .option pop + + j main +END(_main)

Hallo wine-users, I'm new to wine and to this list. During configuration I got the message that libcapi20 could not be found. I did not worry about that, thinking it was an ISDN thing and I don't use ISDN. But now I have to run a Windows application which insists on using libcapi20 :( I have been searching with Google, but not been able to find any sources for it. Could somebody please

...######################### In parallele to this error some new folders are created on the mailboxes root with name containing ? nonexistent mailbox? ? : ################################################################################################## 16:00:37 root at mx01 /mnt/mail/vmail # lla total 48 drwxr-xr-x 12 vmail vmail 4096 f?vr. 25 16:00 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 f?vr. 11 12:13 .. drwx------ 2 vmail vmail 4096 f?vr. 25 16:00 (nonexistent mailbox with GUID=47376e22c8876e5cff5b000036d82855) drwx------ 2 vmail vmail 4096 f?vr. 25 16:00 (nonexistent mailbox with GUID=...

New architectures only define the renameat2() system call, which was added in Linux 3.15. Define rename() and renameat() as wrappers for it if necessary. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> --- --- a/usr/klibc/Kbuild +++ b/usr/klibc/Kbuild @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ klib-y += vsnprintf.o snprintf.o vsprint inet/inet_ntoa.o inet/inet_aton.o inet/inet_addr.o \

...libc/arch/loongarch64/crt0.S @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # -# arch/riscv64/crt0.S +# arch/loongarch64/crt0.S # # Does arch-specific initialization and invokes __libc_init # with the appropriate arguments. @@ -11,12 +11,8 @@ #include <machine/asm.h> ENTRY(_start) - .option push - .option norelax - lla gp, __global_pointer$ - .option pop - - mv a0, sp # Pointer to ELF entry structure - mv a1, zero # No onexit pointer - jal __libc_init + move $a0, $sp # Pointer to ELF entry structure + move $a1, $zero # No onexit pointer + bstrins.d $sp, $zero, 3, 0 # Align stack to 16 bytes + bl __libc_in...

...+1,22 @@ +# +# arch/riscv64/crt0.S +# +# Does arch-specific initialization and invokes __libc_init +# with the appropriate arguments. +# +# See __static_init.c or __shared_init.c for the expected +# arguments. +# + +#include <machine/asm.h> + +ENTRY(_start) + .option push + .option norelax + lla gp, __global_pointer$ + .option pop + + mv a0, sp # Pointer to ELF entry structure + mv a1, zero # No onexit pointer + jal __libc_init +END(_start) diff --git a/usr/klibc/arch/riscv64/setjmp.S b/usr/klibc/arch/riscv64/setjmp.S new file mode 100644 index 0000000..66e009e --- /dev/null +++ b/usr/k...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking