search for: lj93

...see exactly the same problem with llvm-gcc-4.0 for any code > containing eh constructs. I think Anton is the guy to look into > this (CC'd). In my experience, you can work around this sort of errors on Darwin using the following trick (also employed by gcc normally): .set L$set$4,Lj93-Lj95 .long L$set$4 (the .set can also come after the use of the set expression). I've never really understood the reason for the requirement of this detour. Jonas

Hi Bill, > I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during bootstrapping: > > ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, > "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" > ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined in a > subtraction expression this is the darwin assembler that barfs, right? It