Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "livid".
Did you mean:
lived
2000 Nov 08
0
Re: [livid-dev] Re: some comments on the ovd proposal
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:33:48 -0800
Michel LESPINASSE <walken@zoy.org> wrote:
> One reason is i18n of subtitles. You probably dont want to drag full
> unicode fonts in each decoder...
My point was that we don't want to drag full unicode fonts into the *spec*.
On a desktop-class system, you do want to put that complexitiy in the
decoder. Streams will benifit from universally from
2000 Jun 13
1
Re: [livid-ovd] putting the video into ogg multimedia
I'll get to the technical aspects of these letters in a bit; they require an a
little thought and I'm knee deep in the codebook engine right now...
> <RANT>
>
> I personally favor the MNG approach over the Ogg strategy because of the way
> the licensing agreements read. Ogg is more like "you are free to use this,
> just don't change it without our
2007 Jan 24
2
Samba v3.0.23a BROKE my network
...d me to understand their frustration. It
was not my fault. I became cross. The dog got my dinner (it's an ill
wind...).
When I, finally, discovered that what was needed was some new
configuration (explicit groupmap for the 'Domain xxxx' groups) I was no
longer upset or cross. I was LIVID.
I make the following observations:
* if a change is made that invalidates existing configurations
the documentation SHOULD SAY THAT, and it SHOULD SAY WHAT CHANGES
ARE REQUIRED.
* better yet, since these are required settings THE NEW SOFTWARE
SHOULD CHECK FOR THEM and GENERATE A...