search for: liveupgraded

Hello ,,,, can liveupgrade be done zfs i am running snv_35 on sparc if so how tks art This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello ,,,, can liveupgrade be done zfs i am running snv_35 on sparc if so how tks art This message posted from opensolaris.org

# lucreate -n B85 Analyzing system configuration. Hi, after typing # lucreate -n B85 I get the following error: No name for current boot environment. INFORMATION: The current boot environment is not named - assigning name <BE1>. Current boot environment is named <BE1>. Creating initial configuration for primary boot environment <BE1>. ERROR: Unable to determine major and

I''ve upgraded my system from ufs to zfs (root pool). By default, it creates a zvol for dump and swap. It''s a 4GB Ultra-45 and every late night/morning I run a job which takes around 2GB of memory. With a zvol swap, the system becomes unusable and the Sun Ray client often goes into "26B". So I removed the zvol swap and now I have a standard swap partition. The

Hi folks, I''ve been asked to post my experiences here, so... well, here goes :) (in no particular order). We can view bugs in kernel/xen via bugs.opensolaris.org, but not file them against kernel/xen. Could that be added to the list of categories for submission? There''s kind of a composite set of problems with bootadm(1M). While the modified bootadm will update

hi all Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. add a new disks (16GB) create zpool rpool run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool run luactivate zfsroot run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in next boot init 6 but it come up with UFS root, lustatus show ufsroot active zpool rpool is mounted but not used by boot Is this a

I have one thing happening now at boot which must have happened during the migration to zfs boot. I get an error message about /dev/random: "No randomness provider enabled for /dev/random. Use cryptoadm to provide one." Does anyone know how to fix this? Another thing: Is it possible to upgrade to a higher build when using zfs boot? Is this what LiveUpgrade does? And is there a step by

After a liveupgrade and luactivate I can login to the -new- BE. My question is: do I have to luactive the -old- BE again if I want to chose that one from the grub menu or can I just run it if I want to. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv107 ++ + All that''s really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)

Can you use a different zvol for dump and swap rather than using the swap and dump zvol created by liveupgrade? Casper

..., some patches applied, but definitely noone bother to tweak disk subsystem or something else) installation of S10U3 is actually faster than S10U4, and a lot faster. Actually it''s even faster on compressed ZFS with S10U3 than on uncompressed with S10U4. My configuration - default Update 3 LiveUpgraded to Update 4 with ZFS filesystem on dedicated disk, and I''m working with same files which are on same physical cylinders, so it''s not likely a problem with HDD itself. I''m doing as simple as just $time dd if=file.dbf of=/dev/null in few parallel tasks. On Update3 it'...

I was asked by a coworker about recovering destroyed datasets on ZFS - and whether it is possible at all? As a related question, if a filesystem dataset was recursively destroyed along with all its snapshots, is there some means to at least find some pointers whether it existed at all? I remember "zpool import -D" can be used to import whole destroyed pools. But crawling around the

Greetings all- I have a new X4200 that I''m getting ready to deploy. It has four 146 GB SAS drives. I''d like to setup the box for maximum redundancy on the data stored on these drives. Unfortunately, it looks like ZFS boot/root aren''t really options at this time. The LSI Logic controller in this box only supports either a RAID0 array with all four disks, or a RAID 1

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 7:26 PM Sami Ketola <Sami.Ketola at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Believe me it does. I used to work for Sun Microsystems for 14 years in > Solaris support and sustaining and I can guarantee you that it does. > > You problem is that Solaris has concept of Secure Runtime Linker, and for > trusted applications most of LD_CONFIG and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is ignored

I have a Solaris 11 build server with build 58 and a zfs scratch filesystem. When trying to upgrade to build 63 using liveupgrade I get the following upon reboot. The machine never comes up. Just keeps giving the error/warning below. Is there something I am doing wrong? WARNING: /ssm at 0,0/pci at 1c,600000/scsi at 1 (mpt0): Received invalid reply frame address 0x480 WARNING: /ssm at

Hi All, Please let me know the procedure how to patch a server which is having 5 zones on zfs file systems. Root file system exists on internal disk and zones are existed on SAN. Thank you all, Bhanu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20120121/0672ad27/attachment.html>

Hi all, I've just upgraded my old Solaris 10 update 8 to Solaris 10 update 11 with the latest patches, but after the reboot with the new update I'm having a lot of problems with dovecot. My version is 2.2.13 ( it was the last one, at the time of the first server setup ). I have seen that ( it seems ) the new solaris don't honour the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The first error was a

Hi everyone! I''m planning to migrate a little firm''s Windows server to a HVM machine. The test setup woks fine (it''s basically an MSSQL server tied pack of programs for an accountancy office), all programs can reach the mssql from the outside on the hvm windows. If fact it turned out to be so good, that I''m even planning to simply copy the win image(s) to the

I''m looking for a way to backup my entire system, the rpool zfs pool to an external HDD so that it can be recovered in full if the internal HDD fails. Previously with Solaris 10 using UFS I would use ufsdump and ufsrestore, which worked so well, I was very confident with it. Now ZFS doesn''t have an exact replacement of this so I need to find a best practice to replace it.

I''ve got a server that freezes when I run a zpool scrub from cron. Zpool scrub runs fine from the command line, no errors. The freeze happens within 30 seconds of the zpool scrub happening. The one core dump I succeeded in taking showed an arccache eating up all the ram. The server''s running Solaris 10 u3, kernel patch 127727-11 but it''s been patched and seems to have

Hi, in preparation to try zfs boot on sparc I installed all recent patches incl. feature patches comming from s10s_u3wos_10 and after reboot finally 137137-09 (still having everything on UFS). Now it doesn''t boot at anymore: ############################### Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.23, 2048 MB memory installed,