search for: litttl

...ask you how you see the risks for the emergence of such a situation. More specifically: - Do you know of any patents that might be used against a Speex-based product? I assume that Speex is not violating any patents but regarding to US patent lawsuits everything is possible, the judges/jurys have litttle technical insight. - Are there any products on the market, selling in large quantities, that incorporate Speex? Best regards and thank you in advance, Erik W. Rasmussen Senior Research Engineer Technology Research GN Netcom A/S Lautrupbjerg 7 DK-2750 Ballerup Denmark Tel. +45 45 75 88...

...ask you how you see the risks for the emergence of such a situation. More specifically: - Do you know of any patents that might be used against a Speex-based product? I assume that Speex is not violating any patents but regarding to US patent lawsuits everything is possible, the judges/jurys have litttle technical insight. - Are there any products on the market, selling in large quantities, that incorporate Speex? Best regards and thank you in advance, Erik W. Rasmussen Senior Research Engineer Technology Research GN Netcom A/S Lautrupbjerg 7 DK-2750 Ballerup Denmark Tel. +45 45 75 88 88 Di...

yes unless you use the version as of :> 2004-03-02 17:24:46 UTC (RELENG_5_2, 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1) check it out with uname -a if it does not say -p1 it affects you. My guess, you are affected :) cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van:

...t the most strange is that both send and receive socket buffers on both ends are full all the time, though all rsync instances are permanently in "select" system call and consume 0% CPU time. No playing with options solves problem. If I set big tcp buffers (about 512KB) it runs good for a litttle while but then same slowdown with full buffers. Now some details that might be usefull: I'm using latest (3.0.6) rsyns on both ends. Before I have old rsync (2.8.X something like that) on receiving server and there was different problem: data copied with good speed but after some hours of copy...

I remember a while back seeing someone mention a device that would integrate an apple with a pcnetwork. basically it was a small box that had a samba server built in. you would connect your mac to it with the other side connecting to the hub of a pcnetwork. It would intern allow Apple shares to be viewed in network neighborhood, and macs to mount pc shares./ does this ring a bell with anyone.

...'s "short enough" that > it's not worth the hassle of an external definition. I don't really think > authors are making an actual judgment about how much of a win inlining their > function is most of the time when they put a definition inline in a class. > (maybe a litttle more likely when it's a standalone function where you have > to write "inline" explicitly, but maybe not even then) Good observation, but not quite complete. It is true that a lot of the in-class definitions are small functions (as the author does not bother to provide standalone...

...'s "short enough" that > it's not worth the hassle of an external definition. I don't really think > authors are making an actual judgment about how much of a win inlining their > function is most of the time when they put a definition inline in a class. > (maybe a litttle more likely when it's a standalone function where you have > to write "inline" explicitly, but maybe not even then) Ok, that may very well be the case. > It would seem that improving the inliner to do a better job of judging the > inlining benefit would be ideal (for this c...

Hi guys, Sorry for the OT. I've posted it in some IBM related forums but no reply yet. We've got an IBM pSeries p9115-505 machine from warehouse. I notice that it doesn't have any port for the monitor. Where do we plug the monitor? >From Google it says something about HMC (Hardware Management Center). Any hints is really2 appreciated. Thank you.

Hi all. I have freshly created samba ad server in centos 7 from sernet packages. All goes smooth, exceptly running this command (it's the same hole that i find configuring samba in debian) chgrp "Domain Admins" /usuarios chgrp: grupo inválido: «Domain Admins» also "getent group Domain\ Admins" don't return nothing. I have changed /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd:

I am learning to do some basic dataflow analysis on C code projects, such as Apache httpd. Now I am a newbie of LLVM IR, and there are some problems in doing that. In the official User Manual of how to write a LLVM PASS, they only show the way to generate IR of a single ".c" source file. But in fact there are so many examples that the usage and definition of a function are not in the

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Easwaran Raman [mailto:eraman at google.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:27 PM >> To: Xinliang David Li >> Cc: Robinson, Paul; Xinliang David Li; <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> List >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Inline

...le of an external definition. I don't really >> > think >> > authors are making an actual judgment about how much of a win inlining >> > their >> > function is most of the time when they put a definition inline in a >> > class. >> > (maybe a litttle more likely when it's a standalone function where you >> > have >> > to write "inline" explicitly, but maybe not even then) >> Ok, that may very well be the case. >> >> > It would seem that improving the inliner to do a better job of judging &gt...