search for: litsupport

...; >>>>>>> METRIC: score: grep "Score:" %o | awk '{print $2}' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/test.py >>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/testscript.py >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>> URL: >>>>>>> http...

...METRIC: score: grep "Score:" %o | awk '{print $2}' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/test.py >>>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/testscript.py >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>>>&gt...

...gt;>>> METRIC: score: grep "Score:" %o | awk '{print $2}' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/test.py >>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/litsupport/testscript.py >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>> test-suite/trunk/cmake/modules/SingleMultiSource.cmake >>>>>>>> URL: >>>&...

...oneptually independent of the rest of the testsuite and most people are not running it. - Matthias > On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > If I understand correctly, you wish to put the the test-suite > framework (cmake/, litsupport/, litsupport-tests/, tools/, utils/) > into a different repository than the test sources (MultiSource/, > SingleSource, etc)? > > Conceptually, the test framework (llvm-lit) is already separated, > living in the main LLVM repository. The build instructions (cmake > files) are har...

Dear community, LLVM test-suite includes both default applications (benchmarks, tests) and test harness (CMake modules, lit-support, some scripts, etc.). Test suite provides extension interface to add "external" tests suite and folders. This worked well, we enhanced basic harness and integrated large set of internal benchmarks and applications. However, we have users interested in LLVM

...> - Can tests include other files? Do they need special annotations for that? My initial idea was to just copy over all files in the Inputs folder. Do you know of any other dependencies that I should consider? > > As another example: The llvm-testsuite can perform remote runs (test-suite/litsupport/remote.py if you want to see the implementation) that code makes the assumption that the remote devices has an NFS mount so the relevant parts of the filesystem look alike on the host and remote device. I'm not sure that is the best solution as NFS introduces its own sort of flakiness and poten...

Hi, I am not sure if this is the right forum. Please direct me to the appropriate place if it isn't so. Please keep in CC as i am not subscribed to this mailing list. I am trying to test riscv llvm tools in QEMU using llvm testsuite. As a trial i am trying only the Single Source C Regression folder. The steps that i took are : ]$ cmake -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/opt/riscv-tools/bin/clang

...sider? I didn't notice that we had already developed a convention with the "Inputs" folders, so I guess all that is left to do is making sure all tests actually follow that convention. > >> >> As another example: The llvm-testsuite can perform remote runs (test-suite/litsupport/remote.py if you want to see the implementation) that code makes the assumption that the remote devices has an NFS mount so the relevant parts of the filesystem look alike on the host and remote device. I'm not sure that is the best solution as NFS introduces its own sort of flakiness and poten...

Hello all, we are trying to convert some of the lldb tests to lit (for these specific tests we are using the googletest format). One of our requirements is that we are able to run these tests remotely, so that we are able to verify that we can debug e.g. android arm binaries even though our development environment runs x86 linux). As far as I am aware, right now there is no support for that in

On 28 Feb 2017, at 22:50, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com<mailto:mzolotukhin at apple.com>> wrote: I also usually rerun suspiciously improved or regressed tests to verify the performance change. Most of the time, if it was just a noise, the test doesn’t appear on another run. I wish LNT (or any other script) could do that for me :) Michael Doesn't the lnt runtest nt