Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "literis".
Did you mean:
literal
2009 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's
>>> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler.
>>
>> I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself...
>
> Compared to a
2009 Nov 19
7
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
>
>> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's
>> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler.
>
> I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself...
Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not