Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "literallli".
Did you mean:
literallly
2016 Jul 15
3
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Don't we have the same problems for "exit(0)"
> >
> >
> > This is a noreturn call, so yes, iit has another hidden control
> > flow-side-effect of a slightly different kind. GCC models it as an extra
>
2016 Jul 15
2
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > However, I didn't quite understand your point about may-throw -- how
> > is may-throw different from a generic side-effect (volatile store,
> > syscall etc.)? All of those can't be hoisted or sunk -- we have to
>