search for: list_applications_pacman

...+++ b/src/inspect-apps.c @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); #endif static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); +static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *ve...

...+++ b/src/inspect-apps.c @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); #endif static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); +static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *ve...

...> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ > static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); > #endif > static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); > +static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); > static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); > static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, cons...

...60,7 @@ >> static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); >> #endif >> static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); >> +static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); >> static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); >> static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epo...

...- a/src/inspect-apps.c +++ b/src/inspect-apps.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, st #endif static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); +static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_apk (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct...

...tions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/inspect-apps.c b/lib/inspect-apps.c index 1216c52..eabe565 100644 --- a/lib/inspect-apps.c +++ b/lib/inspect-apps.c @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, st static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_apk (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); -static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct...

...tions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/inspect-apps.c b/lib/inspect-apps.c index 1216c52..eabe565 100644 --- a/lib/inspect-apps.c +++ b/lib/inspect-apps.c @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, st static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_apk (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); -static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct...

...lude "structs-cleanups.h" -#ifdef DB_DUMP static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_rpm (guestfs_h *g, const char *root); -#endif static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, const char *root); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, const char *root); static struct guestfs_application2_list *list_applications_apk (guestfs_h *g, const char *root); @@ -121,11 +119,9 @@ guestfs_impl_inspect_list_applications2 (guestfs_h *g, const char *root) if (STREQ (type, "linux") || STREQ (type, "hurd"...

We went around the houses a few times last year in order to try to fix this old Debian bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409024 My last attempt was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-October/msg00058.html which I believe was neither reviewed nor rejected, so I'm reposting the same patch again, simply rebased against current git. Rich.

Previously posted: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-October/msg00032.html This takes a completely different approach. It turns out that POSIX / the shell already defines a special exit code 127 for ‘command not found’. We can make a small adjustment to lib/command.c to return this exit code in that case. Then we just have to modify the db_dump code to test for this exit code. I

v1 -> v2: - Remove the unnecessary calls to guestfs_int_lazy_make_tmpdir in the final patch. Rich.

Miscellaneous small cleanups in lib/ directory. Rich.

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

..., struct inspect_fs *fs) int installed_flag = 0; status = guestfs_int_download_to_tmp (g, fs, "/var/lib/dpkg/status", "status", - MAX_PKG_DB_SIZE); + MAX_PKG_DB_SIZE); if (status == NULL) return NULL; @@ -617,8 +617,8 @@ list_applications_pacman (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) } if ((name == NULL) || (version == NULL) || (arch == NULL)) - /* Those are mandatory fields. The file is corrupted */ - goto after_add_application; + /* Those are mandatory fields. The file is corrupted */ + goto after_add_app...

Result of earlier copy and paste. --- align/scan.c | 35 ++++++++++--------- cat/cat.c | 39 +++++++++++---------- cat/filesystems.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- cat/log.c | 35 ++++++++++--------- cat/ls.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++---------------- df/main.c | 43 ++++++++++++------------ diff/diff.c | 67

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.