search for: linxnet

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour) wrote: > > John Capo <jc@irbs.com> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > Scuttlebut on NANAE is that Joe was hacke...

...upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html http://jimsun.LinxNet.com |

...e problem? I'm wondering if I can solve it with sssd? Any other thoughts? Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...l modem adapter, as both the laptop and Axxium Pro were transmitting on pin 3. Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...maintain the ldap entries used for dlz. I'm not certain what that meant? Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...your smb.conf file. [snip] Very well. I'll trim out the cruft and so so. Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...tioned a single-sign-on doc. I'll have to hunt that down and take a look. Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

Hello, I just built openssh-2.5.2p2 on an HP running HP-UX 11.00. Seems now when I try and connect to other HP's running ssh with version openssh-2.3.0p1 (using protocol version 2), I'm getting disconnected because of a "Bad packet length" error: ssh -v isd1 ... debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: send

.... Now I'm wondering just how much I'd have to put back, essentially. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...example.com and deepthought.addc.example.com are the same thing, in my case.) Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...about interaction between the Samba AD DC zone and the Kerberos default_realm? Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...(DHCP, DNS especially, never hurts to have multiple more NTP's). I too like to stack up as much as I can on these modern boxes, but I ensure there's some redundancy to cope with the unexpected. I hope the perspective helps -- lee On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at linxnet.com> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:...

...t sub-domain is a dlz. So... how do I set/assign client PCs' IP addresses? Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

....... no. I'm thinking perhaps it's time to rethink this entire plan. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

Hi All, Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on starting over. Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, anyway, I was thinking: Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 Set up an eth0:0

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

...keep seeing references to it. I'll call it "addc.example.com". Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at LinxNet.com> wrote: > But the manual > also says "The Axxium Pro system communicates with your computer using > an advanced binary protocol." I can see that phrase being used to describe BCM/XCP.

...of the drivers. It looks like they're all timing out awaiting a response? Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.

...is sending back, it would help. Maybe I'll try stack-tracing the drivers. Thanks, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.