Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "linw".
Did you mean:
line
2010 Feb 06
1
shadow_copy2 prob? FSCTL..GET..DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed!
...e=true
shadow:snapdir = /home/snapdir
shadow:basedir = /home
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
Yet when I go look at files that that have been modified on the 6th, I see no
previous versions.
In /var/log/samba/clientname.log, I see:
linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3)
[2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl)
FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes needed!
[2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
linw closed file mail/bind (numop...
2016 Nov 11
0
D.C. and File Server on the same server...
...r
Wrong, so very wrong, root has the Unix ID '0' and is the only Unix
user that needs mapping to, a Samba DC automatically maps Administrator
to 'root' and you can do it on a Unix domain member via a user.map
> Domain Admins:!:512:root,Bliss\root
> Remote Desktop Users:!:555:linw,root,Bliss\linw
Whilst Domain Admins may need to be visible to Unix, Remote Desktop
Users doesn't and you don't need to use the RID as a uidNumber, in
fact it is a bad idea to do so.
>
> I used data files looking like:
>
> Everyone:x:11100:S-1-1-0,builtin:
> Creator Owne...
2016 Nov 10
3
D.C. and File Server on the same server...
Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:20:41 -0800
> Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server
>>>> before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the
>>>> tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x