Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "linuxschools".
Did you mean:
linuxschools1
2014 Feb 28
1
Samba4 doesn't respect 'mask' ACL
...t, or a problem with our configuration, but this isn't the
expected behaviour of extended ACLs. We use Samba4 version 4.1.5 and Samba3
client version 3.6.3. Both the server and client are running Ubuntu 12.04
LTS.
Robin McCorkell
Karoshi Client maintainer, The Linux Schools Project
http://www.linuxschools.com
https://github.com/the-linux-schools-project
2017 Dec 19
1
Minimal AD DC server for dev/test setup
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
> There is a term for running a Samba AD DC without dns, it is called
> 'broken' ;-)
Fair enough.
> AD isn't ldap, it contains its own version of ldap, if you want to use
> it for authentication by external tools, read up on using AD with the
> relevant tool.
We are in fully agreement
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
Hi.
As happened some weeks ago, here I am again updating an old Samba 4.14.x network to a current version. The server hosting the FSMO roles is a Debian10 with 4.14.14, while the third node is a Ubuntu 18 running LinuxSchools build 4.14.8.
We started from a Ubuntu 20.04 server running Louis builds. We demoted the node and joined it back to the domain with 4.17.5 from Michael. Although on the node itself everything seemed ok, the DC didn't appear in DNS, while visible in Sites and ADUC.
Replication is reported as...
2023 Mar 08
1
Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
...03/2023 11:07, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote:
>> Hi.
>> As happened some weeks ago, here I am again updating an old Samba 4.14.x network
>> to a current version. The server hosting the FSMO roles is a Debian10 with
>> 4.14.14, while the third node is a Ubuntu 18 running LinuxSchools build 4.14.8.
>>
>> We started from a Ubuntu 20.04 server running Louis builds. We demoted the node
>> and joined it back to the domain with 4.17.5 from Michael. Although on the node
>> itself everything seemed ok, the DC didn't appear in DNS, while visible in
>&...