search for: linuxkid

Hi, I''ve a linux as router nat + firewall (POLICY DROP for INPUT OUTPUT and FORWARD) but, I''ve put next rules for p2p software on FORWARD chain [... snip ... ] iptables -F FORWARD iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT [... snip ... ] iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j ACCEPT iptables -A

[Off topic ?] Somebody can help me to convince some people to use Linux instead MikroTik ???? Happy new year. Andres.

Hi. there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic, in order to put in a highest prio class ? Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but next both server and client seems jump to a random(?) port. I can''t use CONNMARK because is udp traffic. I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4 kernel series . When you patch 2.4 kernel with

Hi, I want to set up a Linux as Access Point, and maybe, as router too. There is some distro or minidistro in order to do that ? thanks in advance andres

on Fair NAT: ------------- [...] # Correcting TOS for large packets with Minimize-Delay-TOS $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -p tcp -m length --length 0:512 -j RETURN $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -p udp -m length --length 0:1024 -j RETURN $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -j TOS --set-tos Maximize-Throughput $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -j RETURN [...] I think that best is: [...] #

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Hi, I used to patch my squid with ZPH patch on http://www.it-academy.bg/zph/ > The idea behind this patch is to allow classification > of packets generated from the squid cache engine towards > clients. > The classification is based on whether the content is > being served from cache (a cache HIT), or > is being retrieved from a remote server (a cache MISS). Very useful

Hi, The new version ipp2p 0.8.0 is released. Klaus -- www.ipp2p.com

Hi, I''ve a vsat internet link and I want to know if I can make VOIP calls under it. ( Ping in the best case reach 900/ 100 ms by sattelite effect ) Can with SIP protocol make voip calls ? Thanks andres

...rt and discussion on freenode, #nouveau: http://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/?channel=nouveau&date=2013-11-23 followed by initial patch proposal: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/95943 From today on #nouveau: Tested-by: Anibal Francisco Martinez Cortina <linuxkid.zeuz at gmail.com> As reported on #nouveau, every now and then someone trips over this issue and falls back to enabling efifb so X server accepts to start without explicit configuration. It would also be worth to add for first patch: Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Bruno > Signed-off-by:...

Hi, I have the shown (end of this post) net work configuration. In a "few" words: My Debian Sarge server is connected to a D-Link ADSL Router (DSL-562T). DMZ is enabled for the Debian Sarge IP on the Router. My Linux server has two NIC''s. ethlan = internal Net ethdsl = external -> D-Link My Linux server is configured to make NAT via iptables. Current state -

...router) > > I have a much more basic question: > I installed a qos script based on wondershaper, which is htb based. > With voip, the result is not correct (I''ve lot of bandwidth with max prio) > How can I mix absolute priority (for voip) with htb? > > Thanks > > LinuXKiD wrote: > >>Hi. >> >>there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic, >>in order to put in a highest prio class ? >> >>Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but >>next both server and client seems jump to a >>random(?) port. >> >>I ca...

hola estoy intentando diagramar un proyecto de ciber cuya red lan este compuesta por PCs que no posean con disco duro, y booten y operen mediante un "gran" servidor central. He leido acerca de LTSP, pero el tema es que necesitaria correr wingarch en las terminales por el msn y el IE (perdon perdon perdon perdon ) (Este ultimo lo podria reemplazar por el firefox.) Puedo hacer esto y

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be:

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better