Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "linuxifi".
Did you mean:
linuxefi
2010 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Call for Help: Testing
...rime that is much more of an admin than I am. I'm
going to see if he has something to donate cycles from, which would be
more useful than me doing it for several reasons. He's a partner in the
real project I intend to rely on LLVM for, so it's a reasonable request.
I know he has a linuxified Playstation, so he might have other fun toys.
Dustin
2010 Apr 06
2
[LLVMdev] Call for Help: Testing
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 14:12:04 Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > The second problem is the lack of x86-32 testing on Linux. This is only
> > going to get worse as x86-32 desktops and servers continue to disappear.
>
> this is not really a problem if you have root access on an x86-64 box. It
> is quite easy to install a 32 bit chroot environment. That's what
2010 Apr 06
2
[LLVMdev] Call for Help: Testing
...build environments people are using, anyway.
I agree. It would be good to have a list of build systems we want working
for each release, as a guide to testers on what they should set up if
possible. I suppose Tanya is the one to decide which platforms are
release critical.
> I know he has a linuxified Playstation, so he might have other fun toys.
Tell him not to update to the latest firmware! :)
-Dave
2006 Mar 16
3
sub returns garbage (PR#8687)
Full_Name: Todd Bailey
Version: 2.1
OS: Mac OS-X 10.4.3
Submission from: (NULL) (87.112.79.124)
sub returns garbage in some strings when replacing something with nothing and
fixed=TRUE. For example:
> a=c('hello','hello'); sub('lo','',a,fixed=TRUE)
[1] "hel" "hel\0\0"
> a=c('hello','hello');