search for: linuxcontain

...custom container management applications." - https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153 And CentOS: "further deprecated packages: libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc, libvirt-daemon-lxc and libvirt-login-shell " - http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 And LXC support from linuxcontainers.org is poor for RedHat/CentOS: "... Also Cgmanager which is currently not available on CentOS 7. So cannot support unprivileged containers and thus LXD. Systemd based containers need at least LXC 1.1, lxcfs and related dependencies that are not available on CentOS. ... For a stable, sea...

...ake and make install. As I am going to install an open source simulation system named openairinterface, Ubuntu is the recommended OS, and I want to install the simulation system in libvirt lxc. (as you may know, there is another lxc user space tool on Ubuntu whose official website is "https://linuxcontainers.org", which I don't want to use). My questions are: 1) Can I install libvirt on Ubuntu with the same installation steps as on Fedora (i.e., manually download the tar.gz packet and install it locally)? I found a link talking about installation libvirt on Ubuntu which installs something...

...re being run. Once this happens, the only way to fix the problem is to reboot the instance and hope that on the reboot, the containers will start successfully this time. In troubleshooting efforts that I've done I've found that the problem does not occur with containers defined with the linuxcontainers.org flavor of lxc. I've also discovered that if I configure my containers to use libvirt's default isolated bridge device virbr0, this loss of network connectivity does not appear to happen when the containers are started. Specifically, I ran a test that repeatedly started/stopped a...

In the "other" LXC project (linuxcontainers.org), you can map a host's physical ethernet interface to a container, e.g. lxc.network.type = phys lxc.network.flags = up lxc.network.link = eth1 lxc.network.name = eth1 Is there an equivalent option for doing this with libvirt lxc? Peter

...nt within your system, avoiding to tamper with it: https://metacpan.org/pod/App::Netdisco#Installation We are running it in production for years and has been great in maintenance and operation (despite my initial fears). Alternatively, you can use a container. See for example: https://linuxcontainers.org/ http://www.itzgeek.com/how-tos/linux/centos-how-tos/setup-linux-container-with-lxc-on-centos-7-rhel-7.html http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=1034720 Cheers, Nick

...tions." - https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153 > > And CentOS: > > "further deprecated packages: libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc, libvirt-daemon-lxc > and libvirt-login-shell " - > http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 > > And LXC support from linuxcontainers.org is poor for RedHat/CentOS: > > "... Also Cgmanager which is currently not available on CentOS 7. So cannot > support unprivileged containers and thus LXD. Systemd based containers need > at least LXC 1.1, lxcfs and related dependencies that are not available on > CentOS....

...lications." - >https://access.redhat.com/articles/1365153 > >And CentOS: > >"further deprecated packages: libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc, >libvirt-daemon-lxc and libvirt-login-shell " - >http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 > >And LXC support from linuxcontainers.org is poor for RedHat/CentOS: > >"... Also Cgmanager which is currently not available on CentOS 7. So >cannot support unprivileged containers and thus LXD. Systemd based >containers need at least LXC 1.1, lxcfs and related dependencies that >are not available on CentOS. ......

...ileged containers, having used several of these myself. >> >> Viktor > > That's your problem - it needs a privileged container so that the container > can change the permissions on the underlying filing > system. OK, I found some evidence of this here: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/samba-acls-in-a-lxd-container/4420/7 It seems that changing xattr information requires real root which is why it won't work with an unprivileged container. If what is said in that discussion is true, then the only workaround for a non privileged container is to assume no support fo...

...dhat.com/articles/1365153 > > > >And CentOS: > > > >"further deprecated packages: libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc, > >libvirt-daemon-lxc and libvirt-login-shell " - > >http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 > > > >And LXC support from linuxcontainers.org is poor for RedHat/CentOS: > > > >"... Also Cgmanager which is currently not available on CentOS 7. So > >cannot support unprivileged containers and thus LXD. Systemd based > >containers need at least LXC 1.1, lxcfs and related dependencies that > >are not...

...rew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > There is a limitation for containers regarding xattrs as I understand > it, so you may need to go to a full DC. ...googling around seems to me that are ''old limitation'', now gone. I've also hitted: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2015-November/012789.html so seems that 'samba-tool domain provision' check xattr compliance and rever to to tdb ACL if not. This check it is ''safe'' (full check)? Or i could end in some ''gray'' area?! There's some more check...

...ntainer by libvirt LIBVIRT_LXC_CMDLINEThe unparsed command line arguments specified in the container configuration. Use of this is discouraged, in favour of passing arguments directly to the container init process via the initarg config element. I am looking for something similar to this: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/manpages/man5/lxc.container.conf.5.html (lxc.environment) Regards, Harish

Hello Pierre-Jacques, First note that you posted your message on the developer's mailing list. For such user questions, rather email: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users According to https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/manpages//man5/lxc.container.conf.5.html lxc.kmsg is only used to symlink /dev/kmsg to /dev/console. Thus setting this to 0 only results in the lack of that symlink. libvirt doesn't setup this link at all, may be it is coming from the lxc domain root file system. On Wed, 2017-03-15...

.... > > > There is a limitation for containers regarding xattrs as I understand > > it, so you may need to go to a full DC. > > ...googling around seems to me that are ''old limitation'', now gone. > > > I've also hitted: > > https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2015-November/012789.html > > so seems that 'samba-tool domain provision' check xattr compliance and > rever to to tdb ACL if not. > This check it is ''safe'' (full check)? Or i could end in some ''gray'' > area?! &g...

...ake and make install. As I am going to install an open source simulation system named openairinterface, Ubuntu is the recommended OS, and I want to install the simulation system in libvirt lxc. (as you may know, there is another lxc user space tool on Ubuntu whose official website is "https://linuxcontainers.org", which I don't want to use). My questions are: 1) Can I install libvirt on Ubuntu with the same installation steps as on Fedora (i.e., manually download the tar.gz packet and install it locally)? I found a link talking about installation libvirt on Ubuntu which installs something...

I'm starting to deploy my new domain in my organization, setting up the new domain and DCs. I'm following the recommendation to create the DCs as ''DC only'', eg with only samba and a root access for ssh. Having to choose between VMs and Containers (LXC), there's differences between them that can involve samba features/performances? Filesystem limitation? Seems to

Hi. Thanks for good program. I'm quite paranoid guy and dont beleave when some program offer me "use chroot = yes". Instead i jail program manually. I was at 3.0.9 and all was fine. Manual chroot only requires files dir, config and personal tmp. 3.1.1 now also want whole /proc only for /proc/self/fd/X instead just fd number. Whole /proc is serious security risk for me. Why? starce

On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 20:18, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 31/05/2020 17:55, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > It's just what's there from a default Ubuntu (minimal) install... It > > looks like snapd depends on it. Anyway, I don't need either here, so I > > removed it entirely. The issue persists, though. > > Did you

...pping is well configured. I would appreciate having any hints abut this part of the settings. Another question : is there any advantage/disadvantage using the lxc Userspace tools[2] instead of libvirt to manage these namespaces ? Thank you for help. [1]http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html [2]http://linuxcontainers.org/

On May 24, 2017, at 9:38 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Warren Young schrieb: >> On May 24, 2017, at 7:05 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: >>> apache uses mod_perl >> >> mod_perl was dropped from Apache in 2.4, and Red Hat followed suit with RHEL 7. > > What is it using instead? There are various options. We use mod_fcgid + Plack here. And

...c7973fe14358822eb1b48521bbaca91c17bd132c7f8c903d79b3 The iso files are also available for direct download from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64 * CentOS 7 1503 Docker Container: ' docker pull centos' will now give you the 1503 container image. You can see the official CentOS Linuxcontainer tags at : https://registry.hub.docker.com/_/centos/ ---------- Special Interest Groups The CentOS Linux distribution is built, managed, and released by the CentOS Core SIG. In addition, we also have the following SIGs that are doing an amazing job expanding and building on the base Linux platfo...