search for: linuxcommand

So....apparently I have some messages which are not RFC compliant sitting in my mailboxes (mostly older ones), and I have some software which is refusing to handle such messages. 1. Does anyone know of a nice way to verify that all my messages are compliant/find those that aren't? (I suppose I could use the existing failing software, but I was hoping for something a little more robust...) 2.

Hai, but dont forget that if you use samba also as print server you need to backup the /var/lib/samba/drivers en printing also. ( and in my case a different folder. ) In /var/cache/samba is the file printer_list.tdb I dont think that recreated, and if it is, you probely will loose the printer settings. I'll have to look that up. Maybe its an option to let the backup scrip detect if it

Dear R People: Sorry for the off topic question, but here it goes: could someone recommend a good bash shell programming book, please? Thanks, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com

Hi, I'm working with this issue for a while, Now I already solve the dialplan issues, but I still have a question about the Callgroups, I read at www.voip-info.org that , there is a 63 limit of callgroups. And I'm wondering why?? and if the 1.2.0beta version supported more than 63 Groups?? (I did'nt find any Changelog for 1.2) or If not There is any unoficial patch for that ? Thanks

Wanted to add that I am using STAR for incremental backups of ZFS snapshots on a member server while preserving ACLs with the -xattr parameter. It is pretty fast (uncompressed, of course). http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/star1.html Ole Am 09.12.2015 um 13:27 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > Hai, > > but dont forget that if you use samba also as print server > you need to backup the /var/lib/samba/drivers en printing also. > ( and in my case a different folder. ) > > In /var/cache/s...

...iled by the OCaml > compiler. It outputs the following: > > 08161b00 T camlRuntime__rt_fputs_208 > 08161a20 T camlRuntime__rt_puts_198 >        U fputs > > I'm assuming this means that fputs is linked dynamically, and puts is not. Don't assume; ask `man nm`. http://www.linuxcommand.org/man_pages/nm1.html says that a 'U' in that column means "The symbol is undefined." (It's there so the dynamic loader knows to pull it out of a .so, I think.) You need to figure out how to pass -rdynamic to the linker, like I said before. http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/OCam...

I tried running nm - D | grep "puts" on the binary compiled by the OCaml compiler. It outputs the following: 08161b00 T camlRuntime__rt_fputs_208 08161a20 T camlRuntime__rt_puts_198 U fputs I'm assuming this means that fputs is linked dynamically, and puts is not. I tried modifying my code to use fputs instead of puts instead, but had no success, however, I still get:

Been around asterisk for two-plus years, but need a little input from the list on this topic. Have a potential client that wants to replace their old key system with *, but they want to integrate a commercial message service (they pay a monthly fee to have special MOH messages generated) into their system. The messages are essentially delivered to this customer via older generation audio