search for: linkdump

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "linkdump".

Did you mean: libdump
2018 Apr 19
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...#39;s entirely possible (and there's precedent in other > > implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. > > > > If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > > from the lower netdev, which needs some games w...
2018 Apr 19
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...precedent in other > > > > implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. > > > > > > > > If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > > > > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > > > > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > > > > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > > > > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > > > > from th...
2018 Apr 18
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...nue discussing, although technically it's entirely possible (and there's precedent in other implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name space reservation....
2018 Apr 19
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...ely possible (and there's precedent in other >>> implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. >>> >>> If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be >>> improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump >>> API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the >>> specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent >>> SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) >>> from the lower netdev, which needs...
2018 Apr 19
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...ecedent in other >>>>> implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. >>>>> >>>>> If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be >>>>> improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump >>>>> API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the >>>>> specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent >>>>> SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) >>>>> fro...
2018 Apr 18
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...> technically it's entirely possible (and there's precedent in other > implementation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. > > If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name...
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special