search for: linkables

...here are several other associations. "Person" has 2 types, "slacker" and "suckup". It is modelled as such: class Linking < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :person belongs_to :linkable, :polymorphic => true end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :linkables end class Slacker < Person end class Yadda < Person end I''d like to have one controller for both "slacker" and "suckup", so I tried using this: @linkable.class If the linkable type is a "Person" I get either "slacker" or "suckup",...

Has anyone considered making a linkable library of the OpenSSH code so that one could programatically interact with ssh? Or is there some other method to accomplish this? Thanks, -Eric

On Mon Jan 30 08:56:06 PST 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > That being said, there is no reason that you can't run code before it; > to make that simpler, in fact, I'm trying to set it up so that the > default initramfs looks like: > > /dev/console > /dev/zero > /dev/null > /kinit > /init -> /kinit I would request we not put in symlinks. The problem is that

Hi all, I am following the LLVM JIT tutorial API based on: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/BuildingAJIT1.html I have 2 independent questions: 1. The tutorial mentions that "*will defer compilation of the module until any of its definitions is looked up*". Does that mean to force eager compilation, i have to keep track of all functions added to the Module and do a lookup? I want the

> > > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives > that > > we know about. Any particular suggestions here? > > I very much care about the functionality provided by linker scripts (for > embedded systems and kernel work), but I do agree that most current > script formats are hard to use, debug, reason about, etc... I have > often

Hi, Sorry if you've seen this message before on llvm.discourse.group or elsewhere -- I've been trying to get to the bottom of this for a while now and asked about this in a few different platforms before. I'm currently trying to debug a bug in a LLVM-generated Wasm code. The bug could be in the code that generates LLVM (rustc) or in the LLVM, I'm not sure yet. LLVM IR and Wasm

On 3/15/23 18:25, Eric Blake wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:01:57PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Don't try to test async-signal-safety, only that >> NBD_INTERNAL_FORK_SAFE_ASSERT() works similarly to assert(): >> >> - it prints diagnostics to stderr, >> >> - it calls abort(). >> >> Some unfortunate gymnastics are necessary to avoid

I''ve checked the Rails documentation but find no mention of link_to ''external url'' or equivalent. Does rails have a built in method to do this? thanks -Lindsay -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 17:44 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > There was some talk of this happening automatically, but this seems > to > have not come to fruition yet. It has. See the bootstrap/ system in master. This hasn't been backported to Samba 4.10 however. The files in generated-dists are intended to be linkable from the wiki as the definitive list of packages for a

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Take a look at how debuggers have migrated through the years. They too >> >> used to have their own script format. Now most (all?) popular debuggers >> do scripting through embedding an actual programming

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:50:06AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 3/15/23 18:25, Eric Blake wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:01:57PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> Don't try to test async-signal-safety, only that > >> NBD_INTERNAL_FORK_SAFE_ASSERT() works similarly to assert(): > >> > >> - it prints diagnostics to stderr, > >> >

Hey Guys, I''ve just encountered this error in Firefox will I pulled the latest scriptaculous rc into project. Sadly, I don''t have a linkable page for you to look over at the point. My question is what is this error exactly? My code before this never got it but now it does. My few searches suggest it''s the browsers way of keeping infinite loops from happening

Hi, I have a problem where I need an auto-incremented id back from the database for a statement that has yet to be committed. The operation that uses the id may fail, and if so, I need to rollback the database. I can''t figure out how to send only the statement to the database without the commit without sending over hard coded SQL. This is what I started out with: 1 def add_album

This is what I have class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :image, :polymorphic => true acts_as_list :scope => image end class Place < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end I want to be able to reorder the images. What I need is for the position of the photos to be set

Hi Sam, First, I want to know the symbol resolution semantics. I can imagine that that is set in stone yet, but just that you guys are still discussing what would be the best semantics or file format for the linkable wasm object file. I think by knowing more about the format and semantics, we can give you guys valuable feedback, as we've been actively working on the linker for a few years

Absolutely. The goal of the tool is to produce both textual and binary DSO stubs. This means you could take a DSO, produce a textual stub, modify it however you wish, and then produce a linkable binary stub from that modified .tbe. That, or you could bypass the textual portion altogether and just produce binary stubs from DSOs. While the textual format is useful, the goal is to make the tool

Hello all, LLVM-TAPI seeks to decouple the necessary link-time information for a dynamic shared object from the implementation of the runtime object. This process will be referred to as dynamic shared object (DSO) stubbing throughout this proposal. A number of projects have implemented their own versions of shared object stubbing for a variety of reasons related to improving the overall linking

I think it would be interesting to have a compiler option to add the bit code to the .s or .o file in some kind of a non linkable section. This would give you the option at link time of doing lto without having to change make files, etc. The driver would need to have some kind of prelink step to extract the bitcode in the case of lto. Just a thought...

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com<mle%2Bla at mega-nerd.com> > wrote: > Keith Kyzivat wrote: > > > And Alex has told me that visual studio-built projects cannot link with > > mingw-win32-gcc produced DLLs... > > This is only true when the DLL being called exports C++ name mangled > symbols. Is there a way to get

Hi, I just started a new page on the CentOS wiki called "InTheMedia" <http://wiki.centos.org/InTheMedia>. I'd like to collect sightings of CentOS in all (linkable) media formats on that page, like newspapers, news tickers, magazines on the web or even TV and Radio. If you've seen some report on the news about CentOS and you have a link - send this link and a short