Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "link_in_lib".
Did you mean:
link_in_libs
2005 May 17
1
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...longer.
>
> This should be possible, though our current makefile system is not going
> to do this automatically right now.
Can I add submit a patch to do something like this (if it doesn't
disturb the makefile system that much)?
Maybe if one is building a library and sets a "LINK_IN_LIBS" flag or
something? I am guessing there might be other people that want
something like this - ie, anybody building a shared library that they
want to use in another application.
--
-Alex
2005 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> On May 16, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> I'm concerned that this leaks the buffer created for the file, can you
>> verify that it doesn't?
>
> I can verify that the functionality doesn't change. If the buffer was
> leaked before, it'll be leaked now.
>
> However, in 'Lexer.l', you have the following
2005 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On May 16, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I'm concerned that this leaks the buffer created for the file, can you
> verify that it doesn't?
I can verify that the functionality doesn't change. If the buffer was
leaked before, it'll be leaked now.
However, in 'Lexer.l', you have the following code:
<<EOF>> {
/* Make sure to free the