search for: lingering

I would like to remove setsockopt(SO_LINGER), as there does not seem to be a reason for its use. If you know of specific reasons we should keep any of these let me know, or run this patch in local test trees where possible. This is against OpenBSD, but should apply to portable with some fuzz. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file:

...migrate away from out Windows 2008 R2 server to a Samba based DC. At this point we have both the Windows server as a Samba server as DC in the domain. After a while, we noticed that changes from the Samba server were not replicated to the Windows machine. Further investigation show that there are 2 lingering objects that prevent replication, and it has been for quite a while. The various procedures on the Microsoft site to remove the lingering objects don't work against the Samba DC. eg. repadmin /removelingeringobjects on the objects gives following error, and no usefull information was found on...

I am experiencing intermittent network failures on rsync 3.0.7 built using cygwin for Windows-XP (SP2). I am using GCC v4.4.2 and the latext version of cygwin. The rsync error long indicates things like: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes to socket [generator]: Connection reset by peer (104)rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync

...nsZones partition. I have completed the steps in this article for the AD NC Replica command and I also turned off Strict Replication on the DC so that hopefully all partitions would come over: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting I am receiving an error message regarding a lingering object in that partition but the commands that they suggest to remove it (repadmin) do not work and I also do not see it through adsiedit. I was wondering if anyone on the list knows how to remove this kind of object from the samba side or whether there is another way around it. Below is the text...

...t Windows 2008 R2 server to a > Samba based DC. At this point we have both the Windows server as a > Samba server as DC in the domain. After a while, we noticed that > changes from the Samba server were not replicated to the Windows > machine. Further investigation show that there are 2 lingering > objects that prevent replication, and it has been for quite a while. > > The various procedures on the Microsoft site to remove the lingering > objects don't work against the Samba DC. > eg. repadmin /removelingeringobjects on the objects gives following > error, and no use...

...wrong; the machine itself was communicating with the internet but I could not access it over the VPN. The most interesting/dangerous thing is probably the crash - a segmentation fault: Jun 21 03:48:33 Delta tinc.ufonet[2366]: Old connection_t for Frosty (84.81.194.73 port 43158) status 00d0 still lingering, deleting... Jun 21 03:48:33 Delta tinc.ufonet[2366]: Old connection_t for Jupiter (82.170.170.203 port 655) status 00d0 still lingering, deleting... Jun 21 03:48:54 Delta tinc.ufonet[2366]: Metadata socket read error for Frosty (84.81.194.73 port 655): Connection reset by peer Jun 21 03:48:58 Delt...

...running the latest samba release (2.2.8a), and everything seems to be running fine. Except for something that does not look quite right. Connections to the IPC$ share are being left behind by samba once the user has logged off. And what's even more troubling is that the pid associated with the lingering IPC$ connection is picked up by the next smbd process, and then you have one pid associated with more that one smbd connection. Smbstatus as well as ps report the same weird status. Here's a sample output from both: /usr/site/samba-2.2.8a/bin/smbstatus Samba version 2.2.8a Service uid...

I recently reconfigured some CentOS 4.3 systems that were using DHCP to use static IP addresses. At the same time, the systems were moved to a new VLAN. Here is the approximate sequence of events that took place: 1. ifdown eth0 2. edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 with static IP address 3. wait for network folks to reconfigure switch 4. ifup eth0 I may have

Is it expected that MiddleMan.ask_stats will return a status for a worker that has been MiddleMan.delete_worker''ed? The worker isn''t showing up in MiddleMan.query_all_workers, so it seems that is shouldn''t have a status either. Is there a way to define a callback that is called at deletion, to reset the status, or do I need to write my own method to reset the status

Hi, There's several, to my eyes, somewhat related looking bugs: Bug 36743 - Cannot select: X86ISD::CALL ICE with -mx32 -O2 -fno-plt https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36743 Bug 34268 - JITting of x32 code on x64 fails with crash or instruction selection error. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34268 There's unfortunately been no investigation. I'm asking because I hit

I mentioned this problem in a previous post (in November). This time I'm including a patch. Version: OpenSSH_2.3.0p1 Keywords: setsockopt keepalive hang masquerade interactive Symptom: For protocol 2, socket options (especially keepalive) are not being properly set for OpenSSH_2.3.0p1, even when request in the config files. Furthermore (for either protocol), keepalive is only set for

We're running Dovecot rc15 on Solaris 9, providing IMAP access to e-mail stored in Maildir++. I've noticed that a significant number of message files are currently sitting in the directories ~/Maildir/.Trash/new/. I would have expected that all messages in .Trash would be in the /cur subdirectory (as most are), and I'm not sure how they're landing in /new. If I connect to

After apparently flawed testing, we rolled out SP2 for XP this week as samba seemed to be able to handle printing acceptably in recent versions. Once we rolled it out, we started getting reports of many users receiving the error :A policy is in effect on your computer which prevents you from connecting to this print queue. Please contact your system administrator." on a select few

Do you tnink I can simply apt-get install from that repo to upgrade the current samba? Going down the demote/re-join route, I'm encountering problems demoting the DC: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server DC1.mydomain.local to synchronize from us Error while demoting, re-enabling inbound replication ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): Error while

Hello everyone, we are running a central server (CentOS 6.5, dovecot-2.0.9-7.el6 with a small patch to disable the IMAP CREATE command, and openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7) and distribute standard client software to customer( site)s. The clients do IMAPS connects in regular intervals (no IDLE, no lingering logins) and authenticate with certs issued by a dedicated PKI ("auth_ssl_username_from_cert = yes" and a static global password). One of the customers has a major networking problem that hasn't been fully analyzed yet. Sniffing his IMAPS connects on the server side, I see no (necessa...

...rver to a > > Samba based DC. At this point we have both the Windows server as a > > Samba server as DC in the domain. After a while, we noticed that > > changes from the Samba server were not replicated to the Windows > > machine. Further investigation show that there are 2 lingering > > objects that prevent replication, and it has been for quite a while. > > > > The various procedures on the Microsoft site to remove the lingering > > objects don't work against the Samba DC. > > eg. repadmin /removelingeringobjects on the objects gives followin...

On 6/28/11 3:56 PM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The good news is that the new llvm.org SSL certificate is installed and > appears to be configured correctly. As a followup to this, I discovered that I was using the MacPorts version of the svn client on our Mac OS X system. Using the svn client in /usr/bin/svn seems to recognize the certificate just fine. The pattern that

I want to set up a simple Tk dialog interface to a function in R, such that when the "OK" button is pressed, the dialog window is destroyed and then R does its work on the data/parameters/whatever that were entered in the dialog. The function "test" below is a simple prototype. My problem: upon running test() and hitting "OK", R does its work (ie, computes

Folks, I've noticed poor performance using sftp. If anyone has any advice on how to improve performance, I'd like to hear it. Test simply involved transferring a single 143MB MP3 file using defaults for all the program configs. The opensshd 3.0.2p1 server is used in all tests. Software: openssh suite 3.0.2p1 psftp (putty sftp client) latest dev snapshot pscp (putty scp client) latest

Any issues with permanently accepting the intermediate certificate, which I did this morning, when getting the message? Thanks in advance Garrison On Jun 29, 2011, at 12:13, John Criswell wrote: > On 6/28/11 3:56 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> The good news is that the new llvm.org SSL certificate is installed and >> appears to be configured