search for: lindenberg

...able and https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC. What else? Thanks, Joachim root at python:/home/joachim# samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['192.168.177.69'] Looking for DNS entry A python.samba.lindenberg.one 192.168.177.69 as python.samba.lindenberg.one. Looking for DNS entry NS samba.lindenberg.one python.samba.lindenberg.one as samba.lindenberg.one. Lookup of samba.lindenberg.one. succeeded, but we failed to find a matching DNS entry for NS samba.lindenberg.one python.samba.lindenberg.one need...

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nach...

I need to implement split horizon DNS, as I have just one external IP address (dynamic.lindenberg.one in external DNS) but multiple internal ones. External requests are distributed by port or using sniproxy (in particular 443), and all externally visible names are in a distinct zone then my domain, but with an additional indirection: names like backup.lindenberg.one resolve to CNAME backup.rot....

...orward only; forwarders { IP_DC1; IP_DC2; }; }; Ps. If you using Debian Buster or bind 9.11+ You might need more changes. If thats that case mail again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Joachim Lindenberg via samba > Verzonden: maandag 29 juli 2019 18:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] split horizon and authoritative answers..? > > I need to implement split horizon DNS, as I have just one > external IP address (dynamic.lindenberg.one in external DNS) > bu...

...at your domain is properly configured and is currently online." Anyone knows what network address is invalid, what to check or where to look? I also tried to look into the replication issue, but I get the following: root at banana3:/home/joachim# samba-tool drs replicate banana1.samba.lindenberg.one banana3.samba.lindenberg.one dc=samba,dc=lindenberg,dc=one Replicate from banana3.samba.lindenberg.one to banana1.samba.lindenberg.one was successful. root at banana3:/home/joachim# samba-tool drs replicate banana3.samba.lindenberg.one banana1.samba.lindenberg.one dc=samba,dc=lindenberg,dc=on...

In installed a new DC (Samba 4.12.8 on Ubuntu 20.4) and initially everything appeared to work smoothly. Now I experience issues: DCDIAG /s:cobra.samba.lindenberg.one Directory Server Diagnosis Performing initial setup: [cobra.samba.lindenberg.one] LDAP bind failed with error 1326, The user name or password is incorrect.. With the other DC (still samba 4.11.14 on Ubuntu 18.4) many test succeed, but replication is obviously stuck due to th...

On 22/10/2020 19:49, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Password for Administrator at SAMBA.LINDENBERG.ONE: > > Failed to bind to uuid 50abc2a4-574d-40b3-9d66-ee4fd5fba076 for ncacn_ip_tcp:192.168.177.19[49153,sign,target_hostname=cobra.samba.lindenberg.one,abstract_syntax=50abc2a4-574d-40b3-9d66-ee4fd5fba076/0x00000005,localaddress=19...

Please see replies inline: On 22/10/2020 19:06, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > root at cobra:/home/joachim# cat /tmp/samba-debug-info.txt > Collected config --- 2020-10-22-17:57 ----------- > > Hostname: cobra > DNS Domain: > FQDN: cobra > ipaddress: 192.168.177.19 I actually expected more output, but lets start with what we have :-) You do no...

I figured it out myself. The kerberos configuration on the old dc cobra was bad ? no clue why it worked at all until yesterday. After fixing it, testing with kinit, and restarting the dc processes it resumed replication. Joachim Von: Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one> Gesendet: Friday, 19 July 2019 16:54 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: replication stuck? Until yesterday replication between my two DCs (boa and cobra) was running fine. Now I am observing one direction boa->cobra being stuck. I noticed this with a miss...

...one direction boa->cobra being stuck. I noticed this with a missing update of a DNS entry, but samba-tool drs showrepl confirms? Output of cobra shows plenty entries like the following (including just he first of each type): ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=lindenberg,DC=one Default-First-Site-Name\BOA via RPC DSA object GUID: a0c6a86f-61da-4b05-8510-5d7af2cc34b7 Last attempt @ Fri Jul 19 16:46:13 2019 CEST failed, result 1311 (WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS) 709 consecutive failure(s). Last suc...

...x.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable including the workaround described in https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882, but I keep getting samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file /var/lib/samba/private/dns/samba.lindenberg.one.zone DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already exist Adding dns-dc2 account Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 438, in <module> "DNSNAME" : dnsname } File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samb...

You copied the certificate file?? Am 22. Juli 2019 12:46:34 MESZ schrieb Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one>: >Hi Stefan, >> pls show how you fixed it >See >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Kerberos >for the test. My fix was to take the one generated on the newer DC also >to the older one. >Joachim...

I set up a new windows machine and joined it to my existing domain (two Samba DCs). Now it turns out there is a computer in AD, but the associated DNS A/AAAA records of the new machine are missing. I already tried to leave and rejoin, but that didn?t fix the issue. Due to the long ACL I don?t really like the idea of creating the records manually. How can I fix or diagnose that situation?

...c > eptable > including the workaround described in > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882, but I keep getting  > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information > DNS > accounts already exist No zone file > /var/lib/samba/private/dns/samba.lindenberg.one.zone > DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already > exist > Adding dns-dc2 account Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 438, in <module> >     "DNSNAME" : dnsname } >   File "/usr/li...

...ht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Rowland penny via samba Gesendet: Friday, 19 July 2019 14:28 An: sambalist <samba at lists.samba.org> Betreff: Re: [Samba] SAMBA AD DC - Windows explorer.exe crashes on security tab access On 19/07/2019 12:10, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > this is what I do to get windows explorer (mine was a virtual machine windows 10 pro upgraded recently to 1903) to crash: > > - on samba DC, obtain your sysvol directory from /etc/samba/smb.conf and do a > sudo mkdir <sysvoldir>/<domain>/test >...

...conf. I was running a local backup on DC with Louis build 4.10.6 on ubuntu 18.04.2. Shall I open a ticket? Best Regards, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Tim Beale via samba Gesendet: Sunday, 21 July 2019 23:52 An: Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one>; samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba-tool domain backup online && --configfile On 20/07/19 8:42 PM, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > On > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Back_up_and_Restoring_a_Samba_AD_DC#Online_DC_backup there...

On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Back_up_and_Restoring_a_Samba_AD_DC#Online_DC_backup there is a comment ?you may want to specify a --configfile option so that the correct smb.conf settings get included in the backup.? Why does samba-tool not pick up the one it (or other parts of Samba) is compiled with automatically? Like `smbd -b | grep "CONFIGFILE" | sed -n -E

On 14/11/2020 15:51, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 14/11/2020 12:56, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: >> Sure. Here they are: >> >> root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list >> # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to >> upgrade to >> # newer versions of the distribution. >> deb http://de.archive.ubuntu....

Hi Joachim, > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > ?Hi Rowland, > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6 internally. Many disagree. > But I know some organizations that want to switch to IPv6 consistently and you can...

Hi Marco, anybody, > + must be 'privileged' container (no unprivileged ones) I have seen containers with and without calling for being privileged, but you never know without trying and testing carefully... Googling I found https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/3442#issuecomment-312560949 but I am not really clear about the conclusion. Does it really have to be privileged? Thanks & Best