Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "limit_in_byt".
Did you mean:
limit_in_bytes
2018 Dec 19
0
Cgroups : memory.limit_in_bytes and memory.usage_in_bytes includes file cache?
...ped_file 8192
total_swap 0
total_pgpgin 29265847812
total_pgpgout 29244880354
total_pgfault 48530374728
total_pgmajfault 20
total_inactive_anon 0
total_active_anon 2441216
total_inactive_file 85879496704
total_active_file 770048
total_unevictable 0
cat memory.usage_in_bytes
85885800448
cat memory.limit_in_bytes
85899345920
What is confusing is that , why is memory.usage_in_bytes being shown as 85885800448, when the RSS is just 2441216?
Is it true that memory.usage_in_bytes/memory.limit_in_bytes takes files cache into consideration when calculating the usage?
Regards,
Lohit
2014 Sep 15
2
cgroups inside LXC containers losts memory limits after some time
...p.event_control
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:15 cgroup.procs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.failcnt
--w------- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.force_empty
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.failcnt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.slabinfo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.tcp.failcnt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 15 17:14 memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root...
2016 Mar 24
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
...me to time on our installations.
Centos 7.2 + libvirt 1.2.18 and probably on 1.3.2
We have workaround for fix it without reboot LXC container.
1) check that on HW node exists cgroups memory for container.
[root@node]# cat
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2dpuppet.infra.scope/memory.limit_in_bytes
17179869184
[root@node]# cat
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2dpuppet.infra.scope/memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
18203869184
In our case limit exists and set to 16Gb mem and 16+1 Gb for mem +swap
Contaner name puppet.infra, substitute here your container name.
2) if exists - simpl...
2014 Dec 15
0
C group hierarchy and libvirtd
On Centos 6.4 x64,with libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6.x86_64 i am trying to
set "memory.limit_in_bytes" for all qemu process.
changed "cgconfig.conf"
group mygroup{
perm {
admin {
uid = root;
gid = root;
}
task {
uid = qemu;
gid = kv...
2019 Oct 28
1
libvirt_lxc memory limit, emulator process part of the cgroup?
hi,
I am currently investigating a bug with libvirt lxc. Whenever I do a
systemctl daemon-reload on the host, my container loses his memory limit
and then reports having access to 8 exabyte of memory.
I have tracked the issue down to two parts:
memory.limit_in_bytes jumps from the correct value to 9223372036854771712.
libvirt lxc appears to set the memory limit in transient way without
writing a config for systemd. I can't prevent memory.limit_in_bytes
changing by setting the correct value through systemctl set-property
--runtime <scope> MemoryLim...
2014 Jan 30
2
Dynamically setting permanent memory libvirt-lxc
I'm trying to permanently change memory allocation for a libvirt-lxc domain. So far I tried changing memory in memory.limit_in_bytes under /cgroup/memory/libvirt/lxc/<container>/. This didn't help. It appears that libvirt is not reading changes in cgroup.
My requirements are
1) Be able to dynamically change memory of a LXC domain without reboot
2) The memory change must survive LXC domain reboot.
Any help would...
2013 Aug 08
3
Re: libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
...there should be no need for anyone
> to minimize this.
Once or twice, one of our VMs was OOM killed because it reached 1.5 *
memory limit for its cgroup.
Here is an 8GB, instance. Libvirt created cgroup with 12.3GB memory
limit, which we have filled to 98%
[root@dev-cmp08 ~]# cgget -r memory.limit_in_bytes -r
memory.usage_in_bytes libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
memory.limit_in_bytes: 13215727616
memory.usage_in_bytes: 12998287360
The 4G difference is the cache. That's why I'm so interested in what
is consuming the cache on a VM which should be caching in guest only.
Rega...
2016 Mar 23
7
/proc/meminfo
Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2
and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation
in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of
memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 9007199254740991 kB
MemFree: 9007199224543267 kB
MemAvailable: 12985680
2014 Dec 14
0
Difficulty configuring Cgroups on redhat/centos
Hello All,
i am trying to set "memory.limit_in_bytes" for all process
created by libvirt.But i am not able to achieve this on RHEL systems
in Ubuntu servers creating memory cgroup for "libvirt-qemu" user
solves the issue.But in case of RHEL system i tried to create a group
by editing "cgconfig.conf" and then changing cgrule...
2014 Dec 17
0
Again with same Cgroup issue :)
...up with libvirtd on
Centos systems.
I still can not find a permanent solution to limit host
RAM to particular value,tried creating a separate hierarchy "mykvm"
and changed in sysconfig/libvirtd after that vm's memory cgroup
reflects this.But it is not obeying "memory.limit_in_bytes" set in
"mykvm" group,i als specified it in cgrules.conf and restarted it.If i
change that in "/cgconfig/memory/mykvm/libvirt/qemu/memory.limit_in_bytes
" its working.But that is dynamic as i am not able to find a way to
mention that in "cgconfig.conf".
How can...
2013 Aug 09
0
Re: libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
...g the process.
> Here is an 8GB, instance. Libvirt created cgroup with 12.3GB memory
> limit, which we have filled to 98%
>
The more it's filled with caches, the better, but if none of those are
caches, whoa!, the limit should be increased.
> [root@dev-cmp08 ~]# cgget -r memory.limit_in_bytes -r
> memory.usage_in_bytes libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
> libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
> memory.limit_in_bytes: 13215727616
> memory.usage_in_bytes: 12998287360
>
You can get rid of these problems by setting your own memory limits.
The defaults limit get set only if there is no <memtun...
2014 Aug 11
1
Restriciting memory usage for samba using Cgroups
...ith this we are able to restrict the cache memory to ~34MB (never goes
beyond this)
BUt issue we arere facing is the Buffers are increasing gradually and it is
not able to restrict.
Commands Used to restrict memory on target:
echo <samba pid >default/tasks
echo 20971520 > default/memory.limit_in_bytes
Initial memory status:
root at ltqcpe:/sys/fs/cgroup/memory# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 113760 kB
MemFree: 41692 kB
Buffers: 4108 kB
Cached: 30936 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
After 5 hrs memory Status Looks like this
root at ltqcpe:/sys/fs/cgroup/memo...
2013 Aug 07
2
libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
Hi,
I have an instance with 8G ram assigned. All block devices have cache
disabled (cache=none) on host. However, cgroup is reporting 4G of
cache associated to the instance (on host)
# cgget -r memory.stat libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
memory.stat: cache 4318011392
rss 8676360192
...
When I drop all system caches on host..
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
#
..cache
2014 Jan 30
0
Re: Dynamically setting permanent memory libvirt-lxc
On 01/30/2014 10:11 AM, mallu mallu wrote:
> I'm trying to permanently change memory allocation for a libvirt-lxc domain. So far I tried changing memory in memory.limit_in_bytes under /cgroup/memory/libvirt/lxc/<container>/. This didn't help. It appears that libvirt is not reading changes in cgroup.
>
> My requirements are
>
> 1) Be able to dynamically change memory of a LXC domain without reboot
> 2) The memory change must survive LXC domain...
2014 Jan 30
2
Re: Dynamically setting permanent memory libvirt-lxc
...solution that can survive reboot.
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:36 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
On 01/30/2014 10:11 AM, mallu mallu wrote:
> I'm trying to permanently change memory allocation for a libvirt-lxc domain. So far I tried changing memory in memory.limit_in_bytes under /cgroup/memory/libvirt/lxc/<container>/. This didn't help. It appears that libvirt is not reading changes in cgroup.
>
> My requirements are
>
> 1) Be able to dynamically change memory of a LXC domain without reboot
> 2) The memory change must survive LXC domain...
2016 Apr 26
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
...Mb
Alloc 900 Mb
Alloc 1000 Mb
Killed
As You can see, limit worked and "free" inside container show correct values
3) Check situation outside container, from top hadrware node:
[root@node01]# cat
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2d7445\\x2dtst\\x2dmxs2.test.scope/memory.limit_in_bytes
1073741824
4) Check list of pid in cgroups (it's IMPOTANT moment):
[root@node01]# cat
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2d7445\\x2dtst\\x2dmxs2.test.scope/tasks
7445
7446
7480
7506
7510
7511
7512
7529
7532
7533
7723
7724
8251
8253
10455
First PID 7445 - it's pid of libv...
2016 Apr 26
2
Re: /proc/meminfo
...Killed
>
> As You can see, limit worked and "free" inside container show correct values
>
> 3) Check situation outside container, from top hadrware node:
> [root@node01]# cat
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2d7445\\x2dtst\\x2dmxs2.test.scope/memory.limit_in_bytes
> 1073741824
> 4) Check list of pid in cgroups (it's IMPOTANT moment):
> [root@node01]# cat
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine.slice/machine-lxc\\x2d7445\\x2dtst\\x2dmxs2.test.scope/tasks
> 7445
> 7446
> 7480
> 7506
> 7510
> 7511
> 7512
> 7529
> 7532
> 7...
2011 May 30
0
Fwd: cgroup OOM killer loop causes system to lockup (possible fix included)
...GNU/Linux
> (this happens on both the grsec patched and non patched 2.6.32.41 kernel)
>
> When this is encountered, the memory usage across the whole server is
> still within limits (not even hitting swap).
>
> The memory configuration for the cgroup/lxc is:
> lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 3000M
> lxc.cgroup.memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes = 3128M
>
> Now, what is even more strange, is that when running under the
> 2.6.32.28 kernel (both patched and unpatched), this problem doesn't
> happen. However, there is a slight difference between the two kernels.
> The 2....