search for: like_this

...the former being > in the LLVM source tree. 1) Are the C bindings complete? That is, is there some part of the C++ API that is not exposed by the C API? 2) Do the Ocaml/Haskell bindings follow that language's naming conventions? Or LLVM's? For e.g., in Python method names are usually like_this. So which of these are preferred: Builder.set_insert_point() or Builder.SetInsertPoint() ? Regards, -MD.

...l a lot that's not done. Patches are always welcome :) We've got enough in subversion to implement the Kaleidoscope tutorial though. > 2) > Do the Ocaml/Haskell bindings follow that language's naming conventions? > Or LLVM's? For e.g., in Python method names are usually like_this. So > which of these are preferred: > > Builder.set_insert_point() > > or > > Builder.SetInsertPoint() I can't speak for the haskell bindings, but the ocaml bindings do not. We use the lowercase/underscore format traditionally used in ocaml projects. We don't nee...

Hi, Are there Python bindings for LLVM? Apparently there was one ~2005; has this been updated since? Is anyone working on this? Is the LLVM dev community interested in this? Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.

On Mar 26, 2008, at 06:39, Mahadevan R wrote: > Are there Python bindings for LLVM? I'm not aware of any. The PyPy compiler pipes LLVM assembly to llc rather than building the C++ IR in memory. > Apparently there was one ~2005; has this been updated since? Is > anyone working on this? > > Is the LLVM dev community interested in this? Yes! Note that C bindings have been