Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "likage".
Did you mean:
linkage
2016 Jun 25
3
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
Hello LLVM Community,
To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to
force caller
saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To
achive it
I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return early
for
function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() && !F->hasAddressTaken())
and
also reflecting the fact that for local function there are no caller saved
registers
I am also chan...
2016 Jun 25
0
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello LLVM Community,
>
> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to
> force caller
> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To
> achive it
> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return
> early for
> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() &&
> !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
> also reflecting the fact that for local function there are no caller...
2016 Jun 26
3
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
...gt; On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello LLVM Community,
>>
>> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to
>> force caller
>> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To
>> achive it
>> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return
>> early for
>> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() &&
>> !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
>> also reflecting the fact that for local funct...
2016 Jun 28
2
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
...Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com <mailto:vivekvpandya at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello LLVM Community,
>
> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to force caller
> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To achive it
> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return early for
> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() && !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
> also reflecting the fact that for local function there are no caller saved registers...
2016 Jun 27
0
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
...11:03 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello LLVM Community,
>>>
>>> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to
>>> force caller
>>> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To
>>> achive it
>>> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return
>>> early for
>>> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() &&
>>> !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
>>> also reflecting the f...
2009 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] Hi, everyone, fail on building c-index-test
Mmm, do you see that patch? Because the order of those linked library
is incorrect. Mingw can't generate libCindex.dll.
So I midified the likage order.
Also, for the reason of removing duplicated code, I removed some
unnecessay cmake code. And add an new cmake function
2009/10/7, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>:
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:36 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
>
>> That does not mean that every library...
2016 Jun 28
0
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
...ivekvpandya at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello LLVM Community,
>>>>
>>>> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to
>>>> force caller
>>>> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To
>>>> achive it
>>>> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return
>>>> early for
>>>> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() &&
>>>> !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
>>>&g...
2009 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] Hi, everyone, fail on building c-index-test
>
> I've committed my suggested fix. There's no point in setting the
> LINKER_LANGUAGE property of every LLVM library, because CMake figures out
> the right language based on the file extensions of the source files.
Yes, CMake figures out the *right language* based on the file extensions of
the source files.
But, llvm is based on *C++*
for example, if you create a application
2016 Jun 28
2
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
...ndya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello LLVM Community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To improve Interprocedural Register Allocation (IPRA) we are trying to force caller
>>>>>> saved registers for local functions (which has likage type local). To achive it
>>>>>> I have modified TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() to return early for
>>>>>> function which satisfies if (F->hasLocalLinkage() && !F->hasAddressTaken()) and
>>>>>> also reflecting the fact...