search for: lifelong

In the past, I've just referenced Chris's CGO 2004 paper when referring to LLVM: C. Lattner and V. Adve. LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis & transformation. For sub-projects like Clang and DragonEgg, I just cite the URLs: [4] Clang. clang.llvm.org. [5] DragonEgg. dragonegg.llvm.org. I don't know of any canonical references for these. On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu&gt...

Hi everybody, Recently, I found the Lifelong Code Optimization project on the website. And I have a question here, would you please explain it for me? In the home page of the project, it is said that the Goal of the project is to enable mordern programs to be optimized at link time with all static binary code. Here I wonder, why the librar...

...past, I've just referenced Chris's CGO 2004 paper when > referring to LLVM: I second that. We at Illinois typically cite Chris's CGO paper. The bibtex is: @InProceedings{LLVM:CGO04, Author = {Chris Lattner and Vikram Adve}, Title = {{LLVM}: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis and Transformation}, Booktitle = CGO, Address = {San Jose, CA, USA}, Month = {Mar}, Year = {2004}, pages = {75--88}, } -- John T. > > C. Lattner and V. Adve. LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong > program analysis & transformati...

Hi Terry, I'm not part of that project but I'll take a stab at answering your question. Vikram Adve is probably the person to answer. The point of Lifelong Code Optimization is to continuously optimize the code during its lifetime, even while it is running. By profiling the code, it is possible to discover the program's hot spots and intensely optimize those portions of the program. Since we're talking about pretty intense optimization here, w...

hello, I have a question about the llvm jit. Does it use the profile information generated during runtime to enhance the generated code for arm processor? according to 'LLVM: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis **<http://llvm.org/pubs/2004-01-30-CGO-LLVM.html>' it is available but can't find it in the current source code. I really appreciate any help. Thanks in advance Sara, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llv...

...seek the holy grail. But mostly to fix the rampant 404 download links for CentOS Atomic media here: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download - the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download Ex RedHatter and lifelong CentOS user/supporter. Thanks folks! John Boero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20181101/4f4278ec/attachment-0006.html>

...VMdev] llvm jit**** > > ** ** > > hello,**** > > I have a question about the llvm jit.**** > > Does it use the profile information generated during runtime to enhance > the generated code for arm processor?**** > > according to 'LLVM: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis > <http://llvm.org/pubs/2004-01-30-CGO-LLVM.html>' it is available but > can't find it in the current source code. **** > > I really appreciate any help.**** > > **** > > Thanks in advance**** > > Sara,**** > -------------- next part...

I just had a chance to read some of follow-up comments on Reid's initial document. I agree with Chris's discussion below of what is needed for users to get IPO/lifelong opt'n via LLVM without extensive changes to Makefiles, and about what .o files should contain. This is in perfect agreement with what I just said about how users should view LLVM. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Jul 28, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Chris Lattner wr...

...--Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On May 22, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Terry, > > I'm not part of that project but I'll take a stab at answering your > question. Vikram Adve is probably the person to answer. > > The point of Lifelong Code Optimization is to continuously optimize the > code during its lifetime, even while it is running. By profiling the > code, it is possible to discover the program's hot spots and intensely > optimize those portions of the program. Since we're talking about > pretty > in...

...is means that these two commands would do very different things: llvmgcc x.c -o x.o # compile to native .o llvmgcc x.c -o x.bc # compile to bytecode I have to say that I *strenuously* object to this behavior. In particular, this would require all users to change their makefiles to get IPO/lifelong optzn support from LLVM, violating one of the main goals of the system. There are a couple of things that people brought up (including wrapping .bc files in ELF sections, generating .o files containing native code+.bc), but here is the proposal that I like best: :) I don't think that anythin...

Dear experts, Could you please let me know where I can find more information on LLVM runtime optimization and PGO repotimization ? I found 3.5 Runtime Path Profiling & Reoptimization in the paper "LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis and transformation". I would like to get some more detailed information and apply it to our code. I am not using llvm - frontend tools, so I would appreciate it if you could let me know how to add those optimization featuers in the source code ( llvm backend? ). Thank you v...

Dear LLVM devs, If one were to (academically) cite the LLVM project in the general sense, what would be the recommended reference - ie. one that gives a recent and complete overview of the system? Thanks! Vesa

I"m not sure there is an official citation, but you can probably just look at the papers on <http://llvm.org/pubs/> and see what they do. -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130414/df90a7d0/attachment.html>

Thank you George and Joshua. "This can cause major problems. I've rarely (if ever) come across an ALG (that's what that is) that didn't break something." I am contacting the network admin and seeing if he can modify the firewall. I'm a lifelong programmer. Code and programming, I understand. When it comes to the network, I'm clueless.

...t it will be held on March 21 at the Red Hat India office. Details are https://www.meetup.com/CentOS-India/events/248566854/ and more details will be coming very soon. Then, on the following Sunday, March 25th, we'll be holding another Dojo as part of the FOSSAsia event in Singapore, at the Lifelong Learning Institute. The schedule for that event is almost complete, and further details are available here: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Singapore2018 Other tentative upcoming events are listed at https://wiki.centos.org/Events If you are holding any CentOS events - or if you would like...

Hello. I have been a lifelong Windows user and recently, 6 months ago, got an iMac. I love it. I used to play a MUD for about 5 years and am starting to have withdraws. I used Zmud, which had all my triggers, aliases, paths, ect. I have a backup of my Zmud folder, files, config, ect. After some help from my brother, he t...

...f flexibility. So the new compiler by design will be slower, and I am not sure if it could compete with the current one. I am still not sure if LLVM is what I am looking for. if so how can I defend it against C or Java bytecode? Thanks in advance, Lucas S Silva [1] LLVM:Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis & Transformation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070722/ab7051a3/attachment.html>

...udent of Software Engineering. I've studied about llvm. also I 've studied about code parallelization and distribution. There are some problems in real applications parallelization domain that i think using LLVM to overcome them is useful. I know that the starting point of LLVM was toward Lifelong Analysis and Optimization. I read your Open Projects' list in LLVM's website and i couldn't find any tendency to Parallelization. I want to know "Do you have any plan to add parallelizing to LLVM?". I'm grateful for your attention and looking forward to know your opinion....

Dan Cropp wrote: > I corrected my local_net setting (based on advice from network admin). > > I have tried several different values for the from_user and still have > the same problem. > > Asterisk receives the OK from Vitelity. > > Asterisk sends the ACK (without a Contact header). A Contact header is not required to be in the ACK. > > Vitelity doesn?t seem to

LLVMers, As part of my work on bug 353: Create Front End Framework And Compiler Driver (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR353), I'm starting a discussion on the design and requirements of the compiler driver. If you have comments on this, by all means PLEASE chime in. This is by no means cast in stone. The results of the ensuing discussion will be documented in PR353 (and elsewhere) and I'll use