search for: lidy

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "lidy".

Did you mean: lidt
2014 Dec 09
2
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> >>>>
2014 Dec 10
2
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
> On Dec 10, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>>>> On Dec 9,
2014 Dec 09
2
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: > >> I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate location? The user may or may
2014 Dec 10
0
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie
2014 Dec 08
3
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
dovecot --version 2.2.10 I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate location? The user may or may not exist at this time, but I still need to inspect the mailbox ... thank you, Steve
2014 Dec 09
0
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> >>> I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is >>> it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape
2006 Nov 23
4
Windows XP refresh Problem
...guest oplocks = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes [Staff] comment = staff path = /data/staff write list = nina lily lidy hong bob bank read only = No [Invoice] comment = invoice path = /data/invoice write list = lily read list = nina read only = No create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0775
2014 Dec 09
0
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: > I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is > it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate > location? The user may or may not exist at this time, but I still need > to inspect the mailbox ... thank you, yes - -- Steffen Kaiser
2014 Dec 10
0
devoid mailbox status for mail reloaded from a tape backup
On 12/10/2014 01:54 PM, Stephen Lidie wrote: > The reason I did not see -o is because that option is NOT documented in the man pages for my dovecot installation, for whatever reason! Either of our egreps would have found it if only it had been there :( > > [root]# man doveadm|egrep -i '\-v' > -v Enables verbosity, including progress counter. > [root]# man