Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "license_1_0".
2004 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
Reid Spencer wrote:
> John,
>
> If we were to do this, I don't think that adding it to the LLVM source
> base is the right way to go. We would simply use "configure" to find the
> library and header files. The moment we put APR into our source base, it
> would be out of date. Keeping it up to date would not be fun for anyone
> and there's no reason for us to
2004 Sep 13
7
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
John,
If we were to do this, I don't think that adding it to the LLVM source
base is the right way to go. We would simply use "configure" to find the
library and header files. The moment we put APR into our source base, it
would be out of date. Keeping it up to date would not be fun for anyone
and there's no reason for us to do that. Furthermore, this approach
completely avoids