Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "libxx".
Did you mean:
libcxx
2016 Feb 29
2
lld as ld replacement on Windows (with MinGW)
...king
in “ld mode”.
lld -flavor gnu -m i386pe
error: unsupported emulation 'i386pe’.
Is support for i386pe in ld mode something that is on the road map for lld
or should I just give up this route?
In general I would very much appreciate if anyone has any pointers for how
to build a llvm/clang/libxx toolchain for Windows using MinGW runtime (the
end goal being to have a toolchain free from GNU tools and without the
dependency on Visual Studio).
Cheers,
Otto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/...
2016 Sep 10
6
(Thin)LTO llvm build
...after it
failed to build that way, and I wasn't aware of gcc6 providing almost
5x large code than without lto.
Also, given a fresh 3.9 install, on an otherwise gcc/libstdc++ system,
how can I configure and build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LTO=Thin? Is this
supported, or does it require the use of some libXX too?
2016 Sep 10
3
(Thin)LTO llvm build
...binary itself?
Interestingly the non-LTO clang-3.9 is 49MB while the LTO one if 58MB.
>> Also, given a fresh 3.9 install, on an otherwise gcc/libstdc++ system,
>> how can I configure and build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LTO=Thin? Is this
>> supported, or does it require the use of some libXX too?
>
> You need to have Gold installed, but that is the same requirement as for LTO I believe.
> Then if you’re using 3.9 as a host compiler, it should “just work”.
$ c++ -v
gcc version 6.2.1 20160830 (GCC)
$ ld.gold --version
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.27) 1.12
$ clang -v
clang version 3...
2008 Aug 06
8
[ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.1 Available for Download.eml
<<[Samba] [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.1 Available for Download.eml>>
********* *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* *********
Michael Adam wrote:
> That is right: the link creation in source/bin is fixed,
> but the installation of the links is still broken.
>
> It _is_ fixed in the v3-3-test branch which will be used for
> 3.3.0 (scheduled for December). The changes to the Make
2016 Feb 29
0
lld as ld replacement on Windows (with MinGW)
...u -m i386pe
> error: unsupported emulation 'i386pe’.
>
> Is support for i386pe in ld mode something that is on the road map for lld
> or should I just give up this route?
>
> In general I would very much appreciate if anyone has any pointers for
> how to build a llvm/clang/libxx toolchain for Windows using MinGW runtime
> (the end goal being to have a toolchain free from GNU tools and without the
> dependency on Visual Studio).
>
> Cheers,
> Otto
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at list...