Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "libwbc_alternatives_suffix".
2017 Feb 21
2
Offical RHEL AD DC on RHEL
...or there may be some issue with some dependency on 7.3
that wasn't an issue on 7.2.
In case it's useful, this is the extent of my changes to the spec file:
--- samba.spec 2017-01-17 11:21:48.000000000 -0600
+++ samba-dc.spec 2017-01-27 13:58:55.736213036 -0600
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
%global libwbc_alternatives_suffix -64
%endif
-%global with_mitkrb5 1
-%global with_dc 0
+%global with_mitkrb5 0
+%global with_dc 1
%if %{with testsuite}
# The testsuite only works with a full build right now.
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
Release: %{samba_release}
%if 0%{?rhel}
-Epoch: 0
+Epoch: 4
%else...
2017 Feb 21
0
Offical RHEL AD DC on RHEL
...DC. Will that work?
(My current DC is 4.3.11-Ubuntu)
> In case it's useful, this is the extent of my changes to the spec file:
>
> --- samba.spec 2017-01-17 11:21:48.000000000 -0600
> +++ samba-dc.spec 2017-01-27 13:58:55.736213036 -0600
> @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
> %global libwbc_alternatives_suffix -64
> %endif
>
> -%global with_mitkrb5 1
> -%global with_dc 0
> +%global with_mitkrb5 0
> +%global with_dc 1
>
> %if %{with testsuite}
> # The testsuite only works with a full build right now.
> @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
> Release: %{samba_release}
>
> %if...
2017 Feb 19
3
Offical RHEL AD DC on RHEL
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 19:47 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 10:36 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba wrote:
> > >
> > > Centos [6,7]* however does not have into current samba 4.x
> > > version
> > > fully support to AD DC