search for: libusb_detach_kernel_driver

...libusb cflags... -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 checking for libusb ldflags... -lusb-1.0 checking for libusb.h... yes checking for libusb_init... yes checking for libusb_strerror... yes checking for libusb_kernel_driver_active... yes checking for libusb_set_auto_detach_kernel_driver... yes checking for libusb_detach_kernel_driver... yes checking for libusb_detach_kernel_driver_np... no checking for usb_detach_kernel_driver_np... no checking for libusb_get_port_number... yes checking whether to build USB drivers... yes (libusb-1.0) checking whether to install hotplug rules... no checking whether to generate scripts/udev/nut-...

...s in terms of available information, and I don't see any information about sending commands to the UPS (to initiate an UPS self-test or shutdown, for instance). [*] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/upd.4?query=upd&sec=4 If OpenBSD implements the logic behind the libusb_detach_kernel_driver() call (does not seem to be upstream, as of libusb-1.0.18), this would allow users to decide at runtime which method they would like to use for monitoring the UPS. I have never really liked side-stepping the OS HID drivers, so if there is a way to do this from userspace with uhid(4) instead of uge...

...busb-1.0 > checking for libusb ldflags... -lusb-1.0 > checking for libusb.h... yes > checking for libusb_init... yes > checking for libusb_strerror... yes > checking for libusb_kernel_driver_active... yes > checking for libusb_set_auto_detach_kernel_driver... yes > checking for libusb_detach_kernel_driver... yes > checking for libusb_detach_kernel_driver_np... no > checking for usb_detach_kernel_driver_np... no > checking for libusb_get_port_number... yes > checking whether to build USB drivers... yes (libusb-1.0) > checking whether to install hotplug rules... no > checking whether...

* Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> [2014-09-20 13:39]: > * Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2014-09-20 01:12]: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Looks like this patch fixed the problem. I see the status change now. > > Good to hear. > > I'm not familiar with the OpenBSD release process. Is

* Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2014-09-20 01:12]: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like this patch fixed the problem. I see the status change now. > Good to hear. > I'm not familiar with the OpenBSD release process. Is that patch on track to be a part of the final 5.6 release? no, 5.6 is already cut.