search for: libsimplifi

On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. >>>>> >>>> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this

On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >>>>> Once we have support for the `-fno-builtin-FUNCTION' flag, I expect the attribute to look something like this: >>>>> >>>>> "no-builtin-functions" = "puts,foo,bar" >>>> >>>> I guess this could work, this means that

On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> There are two (old) bugs related to this: a PR and a radar. They both seem to be of low priority, though. >> >> One thing that might help in this discussion is to note that attributes are *not* part of the function type (signature, whatever). So we cannot have a function declaration with

On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. >>>> >>> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this patch. I modified it to check the function CI is in for that attribute. >> >> Was that in the

On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> I think the concept of this patch makes sense, but the implementation does not. >>> >>> I have: >>> >>> void foo() { >>>