Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "libgmpxx".
Did you mean:
libgmp
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
...0)
...
> However I have managed to shift the error with the following linkage...
>
> LLVMPolly.so:
> /sw/lib/libcloog-isl.3.dylib (compatibility version 4.0.0, current version 4.0.0)
> /sw/lib/libisl.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.0.0)
> /sw/lib/gmp5/libgmpxx.4.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.5.0)
> /sw/lib/gmp5/libgmp.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.5.0)
> /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 56.0.0)
> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0...
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
...t out of range" dyld errors.
However I have managed to shift the error with the following linkage...
LLVMPolly.so:
/sw/lib/libcloog-isl.3.dylib (compatibility version 4.0.0, current version 4.0.0)
/sw/lib/libisl.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.0.0)
/sw/lib/gmp5/libgmpxx.4.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.5.0)
/sw/lib/gmp5/libgmp.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.5.0)
/usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 56.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current versi...
2010 Nov 11
1
gmp package installation on CentOS 5.2
...rsion 4.1.4 packages were installed. To the best of my knowledge these packages do not come from the gmp team.
Recently, I built an rpm package for gmp 5.0.1 for CentOS 5.2. I tried to update the gmp package by command
rpm -Uvh gmp-5.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm
but the update failed because the libgmp.so.3, libgmpxx.so.3 and the libmp.so.3 are needed from
gcc-gfortran, php, php-cli, guile and gmp-devel packages.
What kind of dependency exists between these packages and gmp?
Could I forced the update without affecting the operation of the above packages?
Since It is better to compile gmp 5.0.1 with the more r...
2020 Jul 10
2
complex migration
...e where the
system is trying to install the i686 and x86_64 versions of RPM's that
conflict with each other , and they don't work because of cross
dependencies.
librt.so.1 is needed by (installed) libdrm-2.4.65-2.el6.i686,
and many packages repeat for
librt.so.1, libutil.so.1, libgmp.so.3, libgmpxx.so.4, liblber-2.4.so.2,
libacl.so.1
I've tried the suggestion of running rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest, which
completes but does not fix the files.
Has anyone run into this i686 / x86_64 dual package conflicting issue
before?? Any suggestions?
Christopher Wensink
IS Administrator
Five Star Pl...
2012 Oct 22
5
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Jack,
I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1
means the initializer called something which
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Hi,
> I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
>
> dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1
>
> means the initializer
2020 Jul 10
0
complex migration
...to install the i686 and x86_64 versions of RPM's that
> conflict with each other , and they don't work because of cross
> dependencies.
>
> librt.so.1 is needed by (installed) libdrm-2.4.65-2.el6.i686,
> and many packages repeat for
> librt.so.1, libutil.so.1, libgmp.so.3, libgmpxx.so.4, liblber-2.4.so.2,
> libacl.so.1
>
> I've tried the suggestion of running rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest, which
> completes but does not fix the files.
>
> Has anyone run into this i686 / x86_64 dual package conflicting issue
> before? Any suggestions?
>
Correc...
2012 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
...ompatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.0.0)
/sw/lib/libppl_c.4.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0)
/sw/lib/libppl.9.dylib (compatibility version 10.0.0, current version 10.0.0)
/sw/lib/libpwl.5.dylib (compatibility version 6.0.0, current version 6.0.0)
/sw/lib/gmp5/libgmpxx.4.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.5.0)
/sw/lib/libmpc.3.dylib (compatibility version 4.0.0, current version 4.0.0)
/sw/lib/libmpfr.4.dylib (compatibility version 6.0.0, current version 6.1.0)
/sw/lib/gmp5/libgmp.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.5.0...