Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "libflac0".
Did you mean:
libflac
2004 Sep 10
3
patches for flac build
> > > Unfortunately, there is a bigger problem that affects both SDL
> > > and FLAC,
> > > which is that the assembly routines are not PIC.
> >
> > It's not? I think all the IA32 code only references data on the
> > stack, and
> > it doesn't call outside the library or export any functions outside
> > the
> > library. The
2004 Sep 10
6
libFLAC docs
> > For those of you using CVS, I have added a libFLAC section to the
> > documentation page. I'm not sure how detailed to make it but I
> > think it's a good start. Let me know if there's anything else
> > you'd like to have in there.
> >
> >
>
2004 Sep 10
0
packaging flac for debian
...archives for
> debian-devel, but in this case you only had to use apt, as flac is already
> packaged and in the archive:
>
> mizar:[~] apt-cache search flac
> flac - Free Lossless Audio Coder - command line tools
> libflac-dev - Free Lossless Audio Coder - development library
> libflac0 - Free Lossless Audio Coder - runtime library
> xmms-flac - Free Lossless Audio Coder - XMMS input plugin
> mizar:[~]
>
> --
> - mdz
>
2004 Sep 10
0
libFLAC docs
.../stream_encoder.h".
> Not sure how to accomplish this with libtool/automake yet since
> I'm still kind of weak in this area.
This is already being done (by me) for the Debian packages. I create packages
for:
- The reference encoder/decoder (flac)
- The shared library libFLAC.so.0 (libflac0)
- The development library and headers (libflac-dev)
- The XMMS plugin (xmms-flac)
Personally, I think this is beyond the scope of the flac source distribution,
and should be left to those who are creating binary packages. The makefiles
should just install the include files.
In fact, this was pa...
2004 Sep 10
0
patches for flac build
...ate to the library.
>
> Matt, do you think this would be enough to make it work? What kind of errors
> (linker?) do you get with the current code?
What originally led me to investigate this was that lintian (a tool to check
Debian packages for possible problems) reported this error:
E: libflac0: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libFLAC.so.0.0.0
N:
N: The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled
N: without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be
N: recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option.
N: Another common mistake that...
2004 Sep 10
1
libFLAC docs
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> This is already being done (by me) for the Debian packages. I create packages
> for:
>
> - The reference encoder/decoder (flac)
> - The shared library libFLAC.so.0 (libflac0)
> - The development library and headers (libflac-dev)
> - The XMMS plugin (xmms-flac)
>
> Personally, I think this is beyond the scope of the flac source distribution,
> and should be left to those who are creating binary packages. The makefiles
> should just install the includ...
2004 Sep 10
2
patches for flac build
...hink this would be enough to make it work? What kind
> > of errors
> > (linker?) do you get with the current code?
>
> What originally led me to investigate this was that lintian (a tool
> to check
> Debian packages for possible problems) reported this error:
>
> E: libflac0: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libFLAC.so.0.0.0
> N:
> N: The listed shared libraries contain object code that was
> compiled
> N: without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be
> N: recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC
> option.
>...