Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "libfdk_aac".
2023 Apr 16
1
Transcode lossy to further reduced lossy to stream over Icecast
...I cannot recreate what bothered me about Opus &
noisy music previously.
It also seems I cannot tease ffmpeg into encoding FDK's AAC with VBR.
As it stands, Opus clearly wins in this scenario.*
Q:
Is it possible to stream in variable bitrate?
*
ffmpeg -i "$track" -vn -ac 2 -c:a libfdk_aac -profile:a aac_he_v2 -b:a $br -vbr 5 "${track}.HEv2_$br.aac"
ffmpeg -i "$track" -vn -ac 2 -c:a libopus -b:a $br -vbr on "${track}.vbr$br.ogg"
On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 16:17 -0500, Brad Isbell wrote:
> Opus or AAC will give you comparable results at reasonable bitrate...
2013 Dec 23
0
Generation loss test
Hi everyone,
I've just finished doing a generation loss test using ffmpeg on the
following codecs at 96kbps:
- AAC (libfdk_aac)
- Opus (libopus)
- Vorbis (libvorbis)
I wanted to see what which codec is best to use for sites like YouTube were
content is often uploaded and downloaded, edited, then uploaded again in
cycles. The results are mildly interesting:
AAC was still passable by 10 generations, in subjective terms it...
2023 Apr 15
1
Transcode lossy to further reduced lossy to stream over Icecast
Opus or AAC will give you comparable results at reasonable bitrates (~128k).
Though, I would suggest finding a way to get more storage. You could
upload to Backblaze B2 or AWS S3 for pennies, if your current host won't
let you upgrade.
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 3:36?PM D.T. <ohnonot-github at posteo.de> wrote:
> Situation:
>
> - remote virtual server with very little