search for: libel

Just thought I''d let you know that your http parser worked great for creating an http protocol handler for Eventmachine. It wouldn''t take that much effort to use Eventmachine for Mongrel, might be worth a shot just to see how it does. A few things would need to be restructered, like HttpRequest where you read the rest of the body, and calling the handler. But it

...urity > vulnerabilities. I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual commentary about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... regards, mark hahn.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent >> repositories safely usable and give a

This is the guy that has a ton of email addresses. Almost as many as he has phone numbers. google "kvj" He doesn't like our president either: Here's look at a MISERABLE FAILURE and I use facts: George W. Bush (herein referred to as 'bushwhack') is the village idiot and he pushed a series of Trojan horses at Americans: 1) The Overtime Pay act is nothing more than a

...what the objection to it was. We have to have > a way to say "These repos are ok" and "these suck" and "these suck worse > than that". The way the page reads at the moment seems to me to strike a > good balance between providing useful information and avoiding libel! > Being able to quantify what good-behaviour might be ( eg. multilib lines up etc ) not only allows us to measure how good / bad a repo is, it also gives the other repos a yardstick to work through in order to become good. I realise that a good repo will do things that are hard to measure e...

...t; > I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable > to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs > explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual > commentary > about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... > > regards, mark hahn. A very old British story goes like that: A British business man was dictating to his secretary a letter for an incorrect business partner. "Dear Sir Because I am a gentleman and my secretary is a lady, I cannot express in words what I think about you. Howeve...

...or the convenience of anonymous nutters who know absolutely nothing > about the user's work situation ! 'anonymous nutters'? I guess those people on the cited mail lists are using fake names. Given you're carrying on about being English, maybe you should contemplate the slander, libel and defamation laws in that country as well as in other countries where your post may be being read. > No need to waffle Warren. You've lost this one :-) I don't think it's Warren who's waffling. I certainly don't think the people on the referenced mail lists are anonymous,...

...e or two programmer-journalist interns to work from June through August of 2012. Desirable skills would include programming fluency in R (for data analysis and visualization), a scripting language (like Python) and SQL. You will get stories published under your byline and should be able to stomach libel threats. As part of the Dow Jones News Fund, the program provides free pre-internship training seminars, 10 weeks' salary, $1,000 scholarships for interns returning to school, and a travel allowance. The salary is not princely, so it helps if you have a place to stay in the New York area....

...#39;m not sure what the objection to it was. We have to have a way to say "These repos are ok" and "these suck" and "these suck worse than that". The way the page reads at the moment seems to me to strike a good balance between providing useful information and avoiding libel! Trevor

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 15:17 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > The answer is clear to me: general security principles. By the time EL8 comes out, we?ll have had ~3 years of warnings under EL7 that weak passwords would not be tolerated, and they?re finally disallowing them. Good! > > (More like 6 years, actually, because EL6 gives a red warning bar for weak passwords.) > > Let?s flip

hello to all, I advice you to not use CDRtool from ag-projects : Fisrt ag-projects talk about is product like a gpl software however they don't provide at least some documentation for non commercial users . try to call them !! i'll offer you some money . You can not Call them for some advices ... It's really a bad product don't waste your time to setup it. this enterprise must

Hi List I need a quality US 800 DID over IAX for my Asterisk server, preferably one that doesn't cost the earth. Any suggestions please? Thanks -- Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061220/4919f3cb/attachment.htm

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

<P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Fixed it! Try these keywords:</P> <P>Viagra</P> <P>Viiagra</P> <P>V I A G R A</P> <P>V_I_A_G_R_A</P> <P>V_E_S_T_E_R_L_I_N_G</P> <P>Karl</P> <P>&nbsp;</P><BR> -- <p>___________________________________________________________<br>Sign-up for Ads Free