search for: libdrm_nouveau

RAOF as noted on IRC earlier today ppa is currently failing to configure xf86-video-nouveau; `checking for LIBDRM_NOUVEAU... configure: error: Package requirements (libdrm_nouveau) were not met: No package 'libdrm_nouveau' found` Effects both 8.04 and 8.10. First observed because updated drm without matching dri causes loss of xv, NoAccel Regards, Mark Carey

Nouveau related headers are installed in I${includedir}/libdrm now. --- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in index 6170613..454fc87 100644 --- a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in +++ b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in @@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ Name: libdrm_nouveau Description: Userspace inte...

The DDX uses symbols from libdrm but currently does not link against it, but rather relies on indirect linkage from libdrm_nouveau. This could lead to insufficient dependencies in distribution packages, seen in http://bugs.debian.org/633786. Signed-off-by: Sven Joachim <svenjoac at gmx.de> --- configure.ac | 1 + src/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b...

...157 nv50_context.c:409 nouveau_dri.so nv50_bufctx_fence 385793 100.000 nv50_context.c:409 nouveau_dri.so nv50_bufctx_fence [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 151037 20.7947 pushbuf.c:482 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 pushbuf_validate 151037 100.000 pushbuf.c:482 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 pushbuf_validate [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83835 11.5423 pushbuf.c:149 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 pushbuf_kref 83835...

...(__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0) [0xffffe40c] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x1f14f) [0xb738014f] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x2003a) [0xb738103a] 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x2010c) [0xb738110c] 6: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (nouveau_pushbuf_flush+0x1e4) [0xb77f8164] 7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x1efea) [0xb737ffea] 8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x2003a) [0xb738103a] 9: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7361000+0x2010c) [0xb738110c] 10: /...

...---------------------------------------------------------------------- 222978 45.1489 nouveau_dri.so nv50_bufctx_fence 222978 100.000 nouveau_dri.so nv50_bufctx_fence [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150576 30.4889 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 /usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 150576 100.000 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 /usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 [self] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39524 8.0029 libpixman-1.so.0.38.0 /usr/X11R7/lib/libpixman-1.so.0.38.0...

...t help. > BTW, youtube says "this video is unavailable". Ohh, Google/YouTube really doesn't like ppl removing G+ account... http://files.zajec.net/20140208-nouveau.mp4 > Is there anything in dmesg when the display corruptions happen? No. > There was also an issue with libdrm_nouveau for pre-nv50 chips, when > compiled with gcc-4.8 some time back... fixed in... 2.4.48 or so? I use openSUSE 12.2 (x86_64) which provides gcc 4.7.1 and libdrm_nouveau1-2.4.33-2.3.2.x86_64. I assume libdrm_nouveau was compiled using that 4.7.1. > Lastly, it may be worth trying 3.11.x and 3.1...

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- include/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 1 + nouveau/Makefile.am | 11 +++- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- nouveau/nvif/cl0080.h | 45 ++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/cl9097.h | 44 ++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/class.h | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/if0002.h | 38 ++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/if0003.h | 33 ++++++++++ nouve...

...ared/sigio.c:108 #1 <signal handler called> #2 0x00007fcc49fd7a28 in ioctl at plt () from /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 #3 0x00007fcc49fd8268 in drmIoctl () from /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 #4 0x00007fcc49fda59b in drmCommandWrite () from /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 #5 0x00007fcc4999aead in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 #6 0x00007fcc4999b4ce in nouveau_bo_map_range () from /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 #7 0x00007fcc49999f3d in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 #8 0x00007fcc4999a53f in nouveau_pushbuf_flush () from /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 #9 0x00007fcc49566165 in exaFillRegionSolid (pDrawable=0x1...

...read.so.0 (0x7f0101eb3000+0xf030) [0x7f0101ec2030] 7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x7) [0x7f0100c8e957] 8: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2 (drmIoctl+0x28) [0x7f00ff00ca68] 9: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2 (drmCommandWrite+0x1b) [0x7f00ff00ed5b] 10: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (0x7f00fe9bd000+0x3197) [0x7f00fe9c0197] 11: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (nouveau_bo_map_range+0x109) [0x7f00fe9c07b9] 12: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0x7f00febc3000+0x7b23) [0x7f00febcab23] 13: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libexa.so (0x7f00fe582000+0x4c47) [0x7f00...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26577 Summary: [regression] Black screen with X on NV11 and NV31 Product: xorg Version: git Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-02-10 20:06 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: >> There was also an issue with libdrm_nouveau for pre-nv50 chips, when >> compiled with gcc-4.8 some time back... fixed in... 2.4.48 or so? > > I use openSUSE 12.2 (x86_64) which provides gcc 4.7.1 and > libdrm_nouveau1-2.4.33-2.3.2.x86_64. I assume libdrm_nouveau was > compiled using that 4.7.1. Hmmm... the nouveau drm rewr...

...t guaranteed by the bus. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> >> >> Pushed! > Thanks! Should we also bump the ABI version or something? If you mean changing libdrm_nouveau.so.2 to .so.3 no! If you mean having something that pkg-config can pick up that's done automatically on every drm release. ~Maarten

...DEFAULT_OPTIONS which replaces six XORG_* macros config: remove unrequired AC_HEADER_STDC config: Utilize util-macros 1.8 for additional man page support config: Use LT_INIT option instead of AC_DISABLE_STATIC config: Add comments for main statements config: Remove unrequired AC_SUBST for LIBDRM_NOUVEAU and LIBUDEV config: remove unused sdkdir=$(pkg-config...) statement config: Set automake options consistently in one location config: Complete bug report URL for Xorg DDX nouveau driver config: Suggest upstream to find macros in case they are missing .gitignore | 71 +++++++++++++++++...

...so.1 (0x00007f8a688a3000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f8a68685000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f8a68481000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib64/libexpat.so.1 (0x00007f8a68255000) libdrm_intel.so.1 => /lib64/libdrm_intel.so.1 (0x00007f8a68033000) libdrm_nouveau.so.2 => /lib64/libdrm_nouveau.so.2 (0x00007f8a67e2b000) libdrm_radeon.so.1 => /lib64/libdrm_radeon.so.1 (0x00007f8a67c1f000) libdrm_amdgpu.so.1 => /lib64/libdrm_amdgpu.so.1 (0x00007f8a67a16000) libdrm.so.2 => /lib64/libdrm.so.2 (0x00007f8a67807000) libelf.so.1 => /lib...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50280 Bug #: 50280 Summary: Mesa 8.0.3 fails to build dri/nouveau against libdrm 2.4.34 Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: 8.0 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority:

...AVE_ALIAS -fvisibility=hidden -o nouveau_dri.so.test ../../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_test.o nouveau_dri.so.tmp ../../../../lib/libdricore8.1.0.so -L/usr/local/lib -ldrm -lexpat -lm -lpthread -ldl -ldrm_nouveau ; /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libdrm_nouveau.so: undefined reference to `drmPrimeHandleToFD' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libdrm_nouveau.so: undefined reference to `drmPrimeFDToHandle' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I'm on a mixed Debian testing/unstable/experimental, with Linux 3...

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> This commit also modifies the install path of the main libdrm_nouveau header to be under a nouveau/ subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- include/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 1 + nouveau/Makefile.am | 11 +++- nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in | 2 +- nouveau/nvif/cl0080.h | 45 ++++++++++++++ nouveau/nvif/cl9097.h...

...ted) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000 CPU_CLK_UNHALT...| samples| %| ------------------ 260163 100.000 qemu-system-x86_64 CPU_CLK_UNHALT...| samples| %| ------------------ 144120 55.3960 nouveau_dri.so 87990 33.8211 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0 11783 4.5291 libpixman-1.so.0.38.0 7884 3.0304 kallsyms 5310 2.0410 libc-2.30.so 689 0.2648 ld-2.30.so 519 0.1995 nouveau 501 0.1926 qemu-system-x86_64 456 0.1753 ttm 239 0.0...

...2) [0x8171da2] [ 771.457] 8: (vdso) (__kernel_sigreturn+0x0) [0xffffe400] [ 771.457] 9: /lib/libc.so.6 (ioctl+0x14) [0xb73e7114] [ 771.457] 10: /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (drmIoctl+0x34) [0xb7198f04] [ 771.457] 11: /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (drmCommandWrite+0x3c) [0xb719ba9c] [ 771.457] 12: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (0xb777c000+0x2dff) [0xb777edff] [ 771.457] 13: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (nouveau_bo_map_range+0x10a) [0xb777f4ea] [ 771.457] 14: /usr/lib/libdrm_nouveau.so.1 (nouveau_bo_map+0x32) [0xb777f5e2] [ 771.457] 15: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so (0xb7159000+0x5497) [0xb715e49...