search for: libcxxdir

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "libcxxdir".

2012 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...ifferent set of artifacts". > > If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know > enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files. > > Thanks, > ashok I managed to use: CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake... to cause it to use clang++ with libc++ to build LLVM/clang. But now I run into bug 10646 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10646). Can somebody comment on when the patch will be available on trunk. I can apply the patch to my local copy but would like to avoid local cha...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...>> If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know >> enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files. >> >> Thanks, >> ashok > > I managed to use: > > CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake... > >  to cause it to use clang++ with libc++ to build LLVM/clang. > > But now I run into bug 10646 > (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10646). Can somebody comment on > when the patch will be available on trunk. I can apply the patch to my > local copy but...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...>  If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know >>  enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files. >> >>  Thanks, >>  ashok > > I managed to use: > > CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake... Why so complicated? Use ccmake and don't suffer anymore! -- Regards, Konstantin
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs >> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it! Nick -------------- next part