Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "libcxxdir".
2012 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...ifferent set of artifacts".
>
> If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know
> enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files.
>
> Thanks,
> ashok
I managed to use:
CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake...
to cause it to use clang++ with libc++ to build LLVM/clang.
But now I run into bug 10646
(http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10646). Can somebody comment on
when the patch will be available on trunk. I can apply the patch to my
local copy but would like to avoid local cha...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...>> If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know
>> enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ashok
>
> I managed to use:
>
> CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake...
>
> to cause it to use clang++ with libc++ to build LLVM/clang.
>
> But now I run into bug 10646
> (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10646). Can somebody comment on
> when the patch will be available on trunk. I can apply the patch to my
> local copy but...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...> If you have any suggestions, I'm most willing to try it out. I dont know
>> enough about CMake but I tried to go through the cmake build files.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ashok
>
> I managed to use:
>
> CC=clang CXX=clang++ CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++ -I <libcxxdir..." cmake...
Why so complicated?
Use ccmake and don't suffer anymore!
--
Regards,
Konstantin
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
> On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com
>> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs
>> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay
around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent
enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features
from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
Nick
-------------- next part