Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "libcc".
Did you mean:
libc
2017 Jun 02
1
[CentOS 6] Possible bug in updating glibc?
Hey all, not sure if this was operator error or what.
I'm running a KVM host on updated CentOS 6. The guest is built from the
CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups.
When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the
libcc versions. Updated just glibc and glibc-common and then installed
mysql. Shortly there after it started to freeze and lost connection.
The KVM host is fairly beefy and mysql wasn't doing anything but running
with no queries or data. I rebooted the guest and it still had lock up
issues.
When...
2007 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for atomic and synchronization instructions
...to be something that is
efficiently implementable on most architectures. Not every operation has
to be equally efficient though: taking a spinlock to atomically update a
i1234 variable is probably ok. :)
Note that while LLVM doesn't have it's own -lllvm, it does use GCC's
libgcc. libcc provides lib functions for things like "64-bit unsigned
rem" for targets that don't support it. In 4.2, it also provides various
synch support features. I think it would be useful to find out what it
provides, as we will want to be able to be compatible with it.
>>> Ser...
2007 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for atomic and synchronization instructions
Torvald Riegel wrote:
> First of all, I know LL/SC. Did I say it's equivalent to get-and-set? No.
> So what are you trying to say, why is the paragraph in the proposal? You
> seem to be speculating about architectures in general in one paragraph.
> IMHO, I wouldn't try that, because I would have to be either imprecise or
> don't state anything new.
I was rebutting
2015 Mar 12
2
[LLVMdev] Customize Standard C Library Using LLVM (to support llvm backend optimization)
...> It has a much smaller code footprint than newlib or glibc.
>
I successfully cross-compile the must-libc using clang, with the
configuration:
C=clang CFLAGS=--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi\
--sysroot=/usr/local/arm-2009q\ -I\
/usr/local/arm-2009q3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/usr/include/ LIBCC=
./configure --target=arm
But how to force clang to use musl-libc rather than its default one? I
tried
clang --target arm-none-linux-gnueabi -nostdlib -static hello.c
~/research/musl-1.1.6/lib/crt1.o ~/research/musl-1.1.6/lib/crti.o
~/research/musl-1.1.6/lib/crtn.o -I ~/research/musl-1.1.6/inclu...
2007 May 10
5
removing string restrictions
We've previously discussed if we should add some sort of selection
option type and not use string options and string restrictions for that
purpose.
I don't think we need a new option type for this. The integer type
should do just fine. The attached patch changes the blur plugin's filter
option from string to integer type and adds the relevant metadata. I
suggest that we change all
2015 Mar 11
4
[LLVMdev] Customize Standard C Library Using LLVM (to support llvm backend optimization)
>
> FWIW, I build baremetal newlib for arm-eabi using clang, and it works. I
>> had to patch a few of the __attribute__((naked)) functions because they
>> were using pre-UAL asm syntax, but for the most part it "just works".
>>
>
I build the baremetal newlib using arm-none-eabi-gcc as well, but after
linking with the hello world program, it failed to run on