search for: libatlas3gf

...'apt-get install atlas3-base' for basic tuned Atlas, or 'apt-get install atlas3-sse2' assuming that sse2 is the closest fit to the cpu in question. </quote> However, while atlas3-base is available in Lenny/Testing, none of the architecture-dependent extensions are. I did find libatlas3gf-*, is this the same thing? The information I found in the R Admin manual seems to apply only to building R yourself, so I'm not sure what to do with the precompiled version from the repository. Is it as simple as: apt-get install libatlas3gf-sse2 And is there anything else that needs doing t...

...rsion 1.2.20110419-2ubuntu1) is present and installed. dpkg: error processing libatlas3-base_3.8.4-8ubuntu1+custom2_amd64.deb (--install): installing libatlas3-base would break libblas3gf, and deconfiguration is not permitted (--auto-deconfigure might help) Selecting previously unselected package libatlas3gf-base. (Reading database ... 142932 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libatlas3gf-base (from libatlas3gf-base_3.8.4-8ubuntu1+custom2_all.deb) ... dpkg: regarding libatlas-base-dev_3.8.4-8ubuntu1+custom2_amd64.deb containing libatlas-base-dev: liblapack-dev conflicts with liblapa...

...or non-francophones : "The following packages will be REMOVED : ..."). | | However, atlas3-base *is* currently installed, and I never had problems | recompiling packages. Quick guess: you have the old atlas-* packages instead of the new libatlas-* packages. Try $ sudo apt-get install libatlas3gf-base libatlas-base-dev | So, my (first) question is : what would be the benefits of installing | atlas3-base-dev ? Isn't that necessary for recompiling packages ? [Make that libatlas-base-dev] So that you can compile against Atlas and get the 'automatically tuned linear algebra system...

...ying to debug memory problems. Now I can't even install an old version of this package on a netbook running the Ubuntu 10.10 netbook remix because it can't find the libraries libf77blas and libatlas. I have even gone to the extent of removing the r-base-core package entirely and removing libatlas3gf-base then reinstalling everything. I still get bates at eeek:/var/tmp$ R CMD INSTALL lme4_0.999375-37.tar.gz * installing to library ?/home/bates/R/i686-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.12? * installing *source* package ?lme4? ... ** libs gcc -I/usr/share/R/include -I"/usr/lib/R/library/Matrix/inclu...

Has anyone succeeded in getting a parallel BLAS, such as Goto's BLAS, installed on a machine running Ubuntu 11.10? I currently have the libatlas3gf-base package installed on a machine with an AMD Athlon X4 processor. I tried to install the libopenblas-base and libopenblas-dev packages but there seemed to be a glich related to having both libopenblas and libatlas3gf installed so that when I tried to recompile R it failed to start because one o...

Hi, Since upgrading to version 2.11.0~20100402-1, starting R fails with: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libblas.so.3gf: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Is this occurring to others on sid? -- Seb

...blas-dev, but you missed atlas-dev. Simply do $ sudo apt-get install r-base-dev " I had already done this but tried again with indication that the latest version is already installed. Taking the clue that atlas-dev may be missing I tried <wow> (ron) dpkg -l | grep atlas ii libatlas3gf-base 3.2.1-8 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software, generic shared So don't see an atlas-dev and r-base-dev does not seem to be installing it for me. The following does not help me either: <wow> (ron) sudo apt-get install atlas-dev [sudo] password for ro...

Hello all: (First of all, sorry for my very bad english) I came from R-help-es with this problem, they say me this is a better place to find a solution, I hope that. I try to use lm function, then R exploit. After I cleaned my code without success I try the basic: open R (try on console and Rkward) and run lm examples, this is the output: ---------- console cut ------------------- R version

...(500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') | Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) | | Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) | Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) | Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash | | Versions of packages r-base-core depends on: | ii libatlas3gf-base [libl 3.6.0-22 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra | ii libblas3gf [libblas.so 1.2-2 Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines 3 | ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries | ii libcairo2 1.6.4-6.1 The Cairo 2D vector graphic...

Hello, This simple SVD calculation (commands are copied immediately below) crashes on my Ubuntu machine (R 2.13.0). However it worked fine with R.12 and Ubuntu 10.04, and it also works fine on my Windows 7 machine with R 2.13, so I suspect there's a problem with (my?) Ubuntu and / or R. I'm using the R distribution that is accessible with Ubuntu's repositories manager, I am not

Hi, I'm trying to install R with atlas in ubuntu karmic 64. I do a lot of matrix operations so I need performance. Doing grep sse2 /proc/cpuinfo tells me tha my CPU supports SSE2. But I don't see libatlas3gf-sse2 in the package repositories. Also, there seem to be some gotchas on how to install atlas, even the vanilla one, as described here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general/159634/focus=159867 I didn't understand what Bill Dunlap proposes as a solution. Has anyone installed R wit...

...o:~$ dpkg -l | grep atlas ii atlas3-base 3.6.0-20.6 ii libatlas-base-dev 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 ii libatlas-headers 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 ii libatlas3gf-base 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 --- R CMD config BLAS_LIBS -lblas R CMD config LAPACK_LIBS -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -lRlapack R seems to be looking for LAPACK in "/usr/lib64/R/lib -lRlapack", probably the wrong place. Can somebody point me to a po...

...0.04 2.84 0.00 0.00 > > (but these days use a bigger size than 10^6 and 10^3) > > Then uninstall all your libatlas packages and make do with refblas3 and > liblapack3gf. Rerun the matrix multiplation. Note the time. > > Now install a libatlas* for you architecture, or just libatlas3gf-base and > re-run the same matrix multiplication. You will see a speed up. > > And you didn't have to recompile R. > > All this brought to you by the wizardry of the former (Camm) and current > (Sylvestre) Atlas maintainers in Debian. We owe them a drink. Or two. > &g...

On two laptops running 32-bit kubuntu, I have found that svd(), invoked within R 2.9.1 as supplied with the current ubuntu package, returns very incorrect results when presented with complex-valued input. One of the laptops is a Dell D620, the other a MacBook Pro. I've also verified the problem on a 32-bit desktop. On these same systems, R compiled from source provides apparently

Hola: Al tratar de utilizar la función lm R explota, no se si se trata de un problema de mi máquina o me he dado de bruces con un bicho. Después de intentar depurar mi código he probado lo más básico, abrir R (probado en consola y Rkward) y lanzar los ejemplos de lm, esto es lo que me encuentro: ---------- Corte desde la consola ------------------- R version 2.14.0 (2011-10-31) Copyright (C)

Today I built R from source on a 32-bit Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS box, and saw that the "make check" tests/reg-tests-1b.R failed. From the output at the end of my "tests/reg-tests-1b.Rout.fail" file, the problem is appearing in the "identical(z, x %*% t(y))" test code below. I then tried the stock R provided by the Ubuntu r-base-core binary package, and to my surprise, it

...Bug #611235 [aptitude] aptitude: file descriptor leak of apt history log Changed Bug submitter to 'Rapha?l Hertzog <hertzog at debian.org>' from 'Rapha??l Hertzog <hertzog at debian.org>' > submitter 576972 Francesco Potort? <Potorti at isti.cnr.it> Bug #576972 [libatlas3gf-base] libatlas3-base: when the LAPACK?alternative points to ATLAS, the BLAS alternative should always point to ATLAS Bug #598638 [libatlas3gf-base] libatlas3-base: when the LAPACK?alternative points to ATLAS, the BLAS alternative should always point to ATLAS Bug #624318 [libatlas3gf-base] libatlas3...

I think this is the fourth attempt to send this blessed message, so let's hope this gets through without any 'unprocessed' or 'ignored' in-lines on auto-reply. I wish to report to you some strange problems I'm experiencing with installing packages directly into my -R- 2.15.1 (there is an indirect solution, which I note below). First, here's some essential information: