search for: libacl

...Why am I doing this? I have files that have extended ACLs that need to be preserved when another filesystem is rsync'd to it. The one Synology includes does not have ACL support (a feature request has been raised by someone else for this). In order to do that, I had to compile libattr and libacl from attr-2.4.47 and acl-2.2.52 respectively. They are installed in a non-standard location (/opt/local/attr and /opt/local/acl) as I want to keep "my" libraries separate from those bundled with the Synology. The libs and includes form those packages are then symlinked in to /opt/loca...

...ap --with-quota After running configure i found the following lines with acl: checking sys/acl.h usability... no checking sys/acl.h presence... no checking for sys/acl.h... no checking for _acl... no checking for __acl... no checking for _facl... no checking for __facl... no I then checked if the libacl is on the system. With rpm -qa | grep libacl this is the output: felixsch01:~/downloads/samba-3.0.2a/source # rpm -qa | grep libacl libacl-2.2.15-23 So libacl sould be ok. After compiling samba i checked for the use of acl with ldd this is the result: felixsch01:~ # ldd /usr/sbin/smbd lib...

...ing to build Samba 4.1.5 on Solaris 10 i386. I tried to join an existing Windows 2000 Server Active Directory domain as an additional domain controller. The join started to work and then died with the error: Error: Samba was compiled without the posix ACL support that s3fs requires. Try installing libacl1-dev or libacl-devel, then re-run configure and make. I downloaded acl-2.2.52 and the attr-2.4.47 that it required. It looks like these are really intended only for Linux. Solaris 10 does have ACLs. I don't know if they can be considered to be posic ACLs or not. Does anyone have any idea how...

...= 0x510000 > > mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2a95556000 > > access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No > such file or directory) > > > open("/home/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/lib/tls/x86_64/libacl.s > o.1", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > > stat("/home/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/lib/tls/x86_64", > 0x7fbfffecb0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > > > open("/home/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/lib/tls/libacl.so.1", > O_...

.../RHBA-2017:2501 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 56c8bd71d132223a86492533476fe9ff37c5ba7c09e21b5927a9efd5b2d717dd acl-2.2.49-7.el6_9.1.i686.rpm fdd9e75884a47e8ef4ebc8552e907cd27405f6e9efbb2be773dcae07c01fc294 libacl-2.2.49-7.el6_9.1.i686.rpm 48295e81557752bcce96dd7271fe5234560db841fe309a732a7e5810323e209c libacl-devel-2.2.49-7.el6_9.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 3afaabd15713abab6adc5033f35b9db225e792d651e42199d59c8444695893a5 acl-2.2.49-7.el6_9.1.x86_64.rpm fdd9e75884a47e8ef4ebc8552e907cd27405f6e9efbb2be773dcae07c01fc...

I'm running into trouble while setting up samba4 on centos 6.4 see #yum install -y libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel python-devel gdb pkgconfig krb5-workstation zlib-devel setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemanage-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl...

...et_file in -lacl... no The log shows that acl_get_file is not found because: configure:13177: gcc -o conftest -O -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib conftest.c -lacl -lcups -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl -lcrypt -lpam 1>&5 /lib/libacl.so: undefined reference to `fgetxattr' /lib/libacl.so: undefined reference to `removexattr' /lib/libacl.so: undefined reference to `setxattr' /lib/libacl.so: undefined reference to `fsetxattr' /lib/libacl.so: undefined reference to `getxattr' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status...

I've managed to fix the problem with copying to a samba share resulting in the "server is no longer available message". The problem was caused by the SGI libacl-2.0.9 upgrade. Seems like SGI broke some of the attr function calls from the acl lib into the attr lib. Since samba binaries tended to be linked ONLY to libacl, and not libattr this caused issues with samba. My solution on the machine with xfs-1.1. and libacl/libattr installed was to edit the sou...

Hello I have samba (2.2.7a) shares on linux (rh 7 & 9) servers with posix-acl (both kernel (2.4.19/ext2 and 2.4.20/xfs) and samba enabled) and an nt 4 PDC. works fine except that I can't change acl of a file/dir if i'm not the owner, thought i'm in a group that has write access to the file/dir I set the "dos filemode = yes" as told in "man smb.conf", but it

...nges: Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the SPEC file. I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file. Rpmbuild -bb specfile.spec. It compile the finally rpm without errors but when I install the package and make ldd /usr/sbin/smbd, I can't see libattr and libacl compiled in ... Where I wrong? Thanks. Marco.

...ion on Samba4 How To page. Installation on CentOS6. I did as below : For RedHat 6.x: $ yum install gtkhtml setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemange-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel libsepol-devel libattr-devel keyutils-lib-devel zlib-devel cyrus-sasl-devel And configure script failed. ######################################### ./configure.developer : Could not find the python development headers /root/download/samba-4.0.0alpha16/wscript:70: error: the configuration...

.../libcups.so.2 (0x4001b000) **libssl.so.0.9.7 => not found** **libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => not found** libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40036000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4004b000) libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0x40079000) libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x4007c000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x40082000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40094000) libpopt.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x40097000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x42000000) /lib/ld-linux.s...

Hi all, linux:/var/log/samba # cat /etc/fstab | grep acl /dev/sda2 /shared ext3 defaults,acl 0 0 >From XP I connect to my server and try to set permission for my user's home directory, but when I click apply the checked checkboxs set back unchecked. :( linux:/var/log/samba # cat log.smbd [2004/03/29 16:06:31, 1]

When doing ./configure --with-acl-support it gives me a message almost at the end of "checking whether to support ACLs... no". What am I missing??

...er amazing thing is that I can use > print command = my own command with parameters > even if I configured I will try to verify this on my system... > printing = CUPS > printcap name = CUPS > > My smbd is linked against cups: > printhost:~ # ldd `which smbd` > libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x40026000) When I verify your report, I will have *no* ACL support compiled in.... > libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0x4002d000) > ... > Here is what the documentation says: > "With printing = cups, and if SAMBA is compile...

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled ACLs on my share with nt acl support = yes Still ACLs do not show up, neither for files nor for directories. (A) Strange thing - a bug in smbd??: even t...

...more 'vertical' way. This net groupmap thing must have passed my attention. I installed a prebuild version of Samba for redhat 8.0. Redhat however does not compile in ACL's in their kernel by default. So I had to recompile my kernel (2.4.24) with the necessary ACL support. The packages libacl-2.0.11-2, acl-2.0.11-2 and libacl-devel-2.0.11-2 where already installed. Only the kernel was lacking ACL support which is working fine right now. However when I do a "smbd -b | grep -i ACL" there seems to be no ACL support in my precompiled samba. This is why I decided to recompile my Sa...

...vi debian/config.cache --> replace "ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=no}" with "ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=yes}" This will allow it to compile. Unfortunately, for me, anyway, smbd,nmbd and winbindd are still not linking to libacl.so (according to ldd). The output is below. If you have any luck actually getting this to work once you have successfully compiled, please let me know. PS-thanks to Max for the link to his page http://homex.subnet.at/~max/comp-12_xfs.php Tom Hallewell Radio Free Asia Washington, DC USA obelyx:/tm...

...stop > service ip6tables stop > systemctl disable firewalld > systemctl disable iptables > systemctl disable ip6tables > Does this change anything ? No, i just stop the problem it´s the same. > > >What packages did you install before compiling Samba ? > > yum install libacl-devel e2fsprogs-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel > python-devel gdb pkgconfig gcc libblkid-devel zlib-devel > setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python > libsemanage-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel > libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel l...

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:09:46 -0300 Maiquel Consalter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > i tryed make some tests, but the problem it the same. Someone have > some idea how i solve my problem ? I try the new instalation, upgrade > all packates but before 1 minute the process still in 100% and the > process is rpc_server. > You say you have compiled