search for: lib_a

> What I am supposed to do next? you said that I have to recompile binutils with --with-sysroot option? It is not an extra step. You have to add --with-sysroot to step 1. > Thank you. Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

hi, So... I followed the following steps in order to compile the llvm-gcc frontend. The single problem is that mentioned in the previous message: llvm-gcc HelloWorld.c /home/LLVM/install/lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.2.1/../../../../arm-elf/bin/ld: this linker was not configured to use sysroots collect2: ld returned 1 exit status 1. I have compiled the binutils for the arm-none-eabi target. Options:

...uot;newlib\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"newlib\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.19.0\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"newlib\ 1.19.0\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -I. -DMISSING_SYSCALL_NAMES -fno-builtin -DMISSING_SYSCALL_NAMES -fno-builtin -O2 -c -o lib_a-memcpy.o `test -f 'memcpy.S' || echo './'`memcpy.S /tmp/cc-qoxxpO.s:51:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'movntiq' movntiq % rax, (% rdi) ^ /tmp/cc-qoxxpO.s:52:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'movntiq' movntiq % r8 , 8 (% rdi) ^ /tmp/cc-qoxxpO.s:5...

I would recommend Newlib. It's easy to configure and compile using Clang. http://sourceware.org/newlib/ - xi On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Gregory Malecha wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering if anyone had any success (even a small amount) compiling any variant of libc to llvm bitcode? > > -- > gregory malecha > _______________________________________________ >

...e output, here are >> some comments. >> >> From your arc mapfiles it looks like that in the output both linker's >> have given the .text output section the correct base address given the >> alignment restrictions as the alignment requirement of .text from >> lib_a-memset-bs.o is 4, therefor the alignment requirement of the >> OutputSection .text should be 4: >> LLD: >> Address Size Alignment >> 00000000 00000080 4 .text >> 00000000 00000004 1 basic-arc.o:(.text) >> 00000000 00000000 0...

Hello, I'm wondering if anyone had any success (even a small amount) compiling any variant of libc to llvm bitcode? -- gregory malecha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110622/b5fad437/attachment.html>

...e explicit questions in? From what I can see in the output, here are some comments. >From your arc mapfiles it looks like that in the output both linker's have given the .text output section the correct base address given the alignment restrictions as the alignment requirement of .text from lib_a-memset-bs.o is 4, therefor the alignment requirement of the OutputSection .text should be 4: LLD: Address Size Alignment 00000000 00000080 4 .text 00000000 00000004 1 basic-arc.o:(.text) 00000000 00000000 0 main 00000004 0000007c 4 ......

...'realloc'' ../../../../../newlib-1.16.0/newlib/libc/argz/argz_add.c:30: erreur: ''last'' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../../../newlib-1.16.0/newlib/libc/argz/argz_add.c:30: erreur: too many arguments to function ''memcpy'' make[8]: *** [lib_a-argz_add.o] Erreur 1 Makefile:1385: attention : écrasement des commandes pour la cible « lib_a-mbtowc_r.o » Makefile:807: attention : anciennes commandes ignorées pour la cible « lib_a-mbtowc_r.o » Dans le fichier inclus à partir de /usr/src/xen-3.3.0/stubdom/newlib-1.16.0/newlib/libc/include/sy...