Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "lib000d".
Did you mean:
lib0000
2010 Nov 08
3
[LLVMdev] Calling PassManager on previously JITed Modules
...Aborted
or
RELEASE_28/lib/VMCore/LeaksContext.h:50: void
llvm::LeakDetectorImpl<T>::addGarbage(const T*) [with T =
llvm::Value]: Assertion `Ts.count(o) == 0 && "Object already in set!"'
failed.
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'lib000d'.
1. Running pass 'Combine redundant instructions' on function '<func name>'
Aborted
It only happens sometimes, so this would imply some kind of race
condition between the compliation and reoptimisation threads, but I'm
definitely not trying to run a PassManager on a...
2010 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] Calling PassManager on previously JITed Modules
...MCore/LeaksContext.h:50: void
> llvm::LeakDetectorImpl<T>::addGarbage(const T*) [with T =
> llvm::Value]: Assertion `Ts.count(o) == 0 && "Object already in set!"'
> failed.
> Stack dump:
> 0. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'lib000d'.
> 1. Running pass 'Combine redundant instructions' on function '<func name>'
> Aborted
>
> It only happens sometimes, so this would imply some kind of race
> condition between the compliation and reoptimisation threads, but I'm
> definitely not...
2010 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] Calling PassManager on previously JITed Modules
...void
> > llvm::LeakDetectorImpl<T>::addGarbage(const T*) [with T =
> > llvm::Value]: Assertion `Ts.count(o) == 0 && "Object already in set!"'
> > failed.
> > Stack dump:
> > 0. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'lib000d'.
> > 1. Running pass 'Combine redundant instructions' on function '<func
> name>'
> > Aborted
> >
> > It only happens sometimes, so this would imply some kind of race
> > condition between the compliation and reoptimisation threads, b...