search for: liasing

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz.sig This is the final v1.1 RC. Tomorrow I'll change only the version number, update the documentation and call it v1.1.0. But please test this anyway to make sure I didn't happen to break anything since rc10 :) - dovecot-uidlist is now recreated if it results in file

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz.sig This is the final v1.1 RC. Tomorrow I'll change only the version number, update the documentation and call it v1.1.0. But please test this anyway to make sure I didn't happen to break anything since rc10 :) - dovecot-uidlist is now recreated if it results in file

Wishpond (www.wishpond.com) is seeking a Developer (Ruby on Rails) in downtown Vancouver. We are a “LEADING” (not leading) local product search engine firm that are going the next chapter for online and social shopping. Wishpond empowers shoppers to find products where and when they need it, and opens new marketing realms for local and independent retailers. We''re looking for someone to

...> original code. These don't turn into general scheduling barriers anyway. They'll be tagged as writing to memory, yes, but like with @llvm.assume, they'll get special treatment in BasicAA and a few other places so they don't hurt code motion too badly. > > > > Aliasing x2 to A is not only unnecessary, but also pessimistic It is pessimistic, but only in the sense that the restrict qualifier does not say anything about it. > because in general you do not have access to the dynamic scope of > the restricted pointer. > > > > > T A, B; >...

I have successfully compiled Ices 0.3 on FreeBSD (4.7 and 4.9). You need to make sure that ALL the dependicies are installed (some depend on others) and when compiling them, that they compile with no problems. <p>Include some output of what errors you are getting and I #should# be able to help you on your way. <p>>From: "dave" <dmehler26@woh.rr.com>

...you still have the original blocks. The > problem is that, at the IR level, these blocks don't remain separate > basic blocks, and the distinction then matters. > > > Agreed. My point is that if you preserve the > block boundaries yo u > > can use > better a > liasing for the restricted pointers. You are already preserving the > blo ck entry > by introducing the intrinsic > ; the block exits could be similarly preserved. I preserve them only weakly... I don't want full barriers; in fact, I plan to add InstCombine code to combine calls to @llvm.noa...