search for: liao1k

....6.1-2 zlib 1.1.3-10 For latex and makeinfo stuffs, I have not found from my AIX 5.2 P690 system. After I run the following command: configure make Following executable binaries codes have been generated in RHOME/bin directory: bash-2.05b$ ls -al total 15900 drwx------ 2 liao1k staff 512 Jul 09 11:27 . drwx------ 13 liao1k staff 1024 Jul 09 11:25 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 liao1k staff 1680 Jul 09 11:24 BATCH -rwxr-xr-x 1 liao1k staff 1738 Jul 09 11:24 COMPILE -rwxr-xr-x 1 liao1k staff 24130 Jul 09 11:24 INSTALL -rwx...

...nfigure > > make > What about "make check"? And thereafter "make install"? > > Following executable binaries codes have been generated in RHOME/bin > directory: > > > > bash-2.05b$ ls -al > [SNIP] > bash-2.05b$ pwd > > /home/liao1k/r-1.9.1/R-1.9.1/bin > > bash-2.05b$ > > > However if I run R command, I got following error message: > > bash-2.05b$ ./R > > Fatal error: unable to open the base package So either you don't have permission to read .../library/base/... or compilation was not succ...

...am pdflatex because of the following > errors: > 0509-150 Dependent module libgcc_s.a(shr.o) could not be > loaded. > 0509-022 Cannot load module libgcc_s.a(shr.o). > 0509-026 System error: A file or directory in the path name does > not exist. > /home/liao1k/r-1.9.1/R-1.9.1/bin/texi2dvi: pdflatex exited with bad > status, quit > ting. > /home/liao1k/r-1.9.1/R-1.9.1/bin/texi2dvi: see displaylist.log for > errors. > Error in texi2dvi(texfile, pdf = TRUE, quiet = TRUE) : > running texi2dvi on displaylist.tex failed > Execution...

> From: Prof Brian Ripley > > We do have alpha/beta test periods for new releases of R, so > would anyone > who did test AIX please confirm that they did succeed. (No > one reported > an error, including yourself: are any AIX users interested in helping > having R available for AIX?) It is much better to have such reports > during alpha test, or at least beta

Dear R Development Team, I just compile R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 using gcc 2.9-aix51-020209. During the compile process, there is an error message saying "return type mismatch in R_HOME/src/modules/X11/devX11.c line 1768. Following is the part of the C codes from file devX11.c /** This allocates an newX11Desc instance and sets its default values. */ newX11Desc *

Dear R Development Team, I compile R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 under 2.9-aix51-020209, and xlf 7.1. In order to let R compile successfully under gcc 2.9, I have to change one C statement of file(RHOME//src/modules/X11/devX11.c) line 1768 from "retrun FALSE" to "retrun NULL", following is C code snapshot: newX11Desc * Rf_allocNewX11DeviceDesc(double ps) { newX11Desc *xd;

Dear R Users, I compiled two R-1.9.1 environments on IBM P690 AIX platform, one with optimization level 3(-O3), another with optimization level 2(-O). I would like to do some performance comparison with these two environments. Can anybody give me some advices for how to do the performance test against R? Thanks in advance. Kexiao

Dear R Development Team, Does the latest version R-1.9.1 provide parallel functions if R is running on Multiple CPUs Unix platform (IBM AIX e-server)? Kexiao [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R Development Team, I compile R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 under 2.9-aix51-020209, and xlf 7.1. In order to let R compile successfully under gcc 2.9, I have to change one C statement of file(RHOME//src/modules/X11/devX11.c) line 1768 from "retrun FALSE" to "retrun NULL", following is C code snapshot: newX11Desc * Rf_allocNewX11DeviceDesc(double ps) { newX11Desc *xd;