Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "li3".
Did you mean:
li
2005 Jun 17
4
linux ip forwarding problem
Hi,
I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets
betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards,
connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between
the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at
its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse
direction.
The forwarding node is
2005 Jun 23
6
urgent TEQL problem
OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t
solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on
it :( )
The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected
directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is
connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My
problem is teql can''t
2005 Aug 10
0
teql on virtual network interfaces ?
Hi all,
I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to
interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create
multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql
will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted
teql is achieved (my guess).
I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I
2005 Jun 22
0
Help: NIST Net or NetEm ?
Hi,
I want to study the multi-path TCP behavior (single TCP connection over
multi-paths), and I am setting up the test bed. I have two machines,
each with two network cards. I have directly connected two eth0, and I
am trying to figure out how connect two eth1 to control the properties
of this connection, so that I can study the TCP on multiple different
paths (different in terms of latency,
2005 Jul 12
0
Teql and NetEm can''t work together
Thanks in advance!
Summary: when I load netem and teql together, teql doesn''t work
correctly. (If I load teql only, everything is fine)
I loaded both netem and teql. Netem is associated with eth0, and teql is
associated with both eth0 and eth1. But traffic only goes out of eth1.
Attached are the commands that I used to configure teql and netem (on
machine 1), and commands to
2005 Jul 26
1
multi-path TCP performance
I am measuring the performance of one TCP connection over two symmetric
paths. Packets are sent to two paths alternatively. I found that when
the latency of each path are within 1ms, the overall TCP throughput is
the *sum* of the throughput of the two paths. However, when the latency
of the two paths increases to 5ms, the overal TCP throughput drops to
the throughput of a *single* path. Has anyone
2005 Jun 22
2
Question: TEQL via gateway
Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided
that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and
hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam.
I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The
two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a
gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send
2005 Jun 21
0
TEQL and Subnet problem (reformatted)
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1,
P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2
and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between
P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL
is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by
round-robin sending packets
2005 Jun 21
2
TEQL and Subnet problem
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My
problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"),
the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to
P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking
for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route
to