search for: lhse

...ely common and recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". These types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". I'm not really happy with this rule, but it is the least disruptive and most consistent I can come up with. I wou...

...recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". > These types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For > example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, > but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". > > While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large > number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". > > > I'm not really happy with this rule, but it is the least disruptive and > most cons...

...recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". These > types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For > example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, > but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". > > While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large > number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". > > > I'm not really happy with this rule, but it is the least disruptive and most > cons...

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > >> I’d like to discuss revising the LLVM coding conventions to change the >> naming of variables to start with a lowercase letter. >> > > Almost all of your negatives of the current conventions