search for: lhs_expr

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "lhs_expr".

2014 Oct 13
6
[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names
...naming "terms" can include words but also extremely common and recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". These types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". I'm not really happy with this rule, but it is the least d...
2014 Oct 14
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names
...erms" can include words but also extremely common and > recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". > These types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For > example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, > but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". > > While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large > number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". > > > I'm not really happy with...
2015 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names
...erms" can include words but also extremely common and > recognizable abbreviations within LLVM such as "rhs", "lhs", or "gep". These > types of terms should not be written as initialisms but as words. For > example, you might write "LE" or "lhs_expr" for the Left-hand Expression, > but not "LHSE" or "LHS_expr". > > While I'm trying to avoid it, this has the advantage of leaving a large > number of initialisms in the existing code base as "stylish". > > > I'm not really happy with...
2014 Oct 13
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > >> I’d like to discuss revising the LLVM coding conventions to change the >> naming of variables to start with a lowercase letter. >> > > Almost all of your negatives of the current conventions